Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

In vitro fertilization: insurance and consumer protection

Article Abstract:

State consumer protection laws should be revised to allow health insurance consumers with adequate information regarding human reproductive technology coverage. The costs incurred by in vitro fertilization and other infertility treatments can be substantial, creating a tension between the need to provide coverage and economic considerations. Requiring availability of such coverage and disclosing that availability would allow consumers to make the difficult economic decisions implicated by insuring such treatments.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1996
Health insurance, Insurance, Human reproductive technology, Fertilization in vitro, Human, Human fertilization in vitro, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Second best: the soft underbelly of deterrence theory in tort

Article Abstract:

The use of tort law to deter marketing of unsafe products and services is unlikely to result in improved product safety and health. Optimal deterrence cannot be achieved because liability cannot cover all consumer choices or account for all factors related to health and safety. According to the theory of second best, when optimality cannot be achieved, correction of some flaws does not necessarily result in overall improvement.

Author: Williams, Stephen F.
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1993
Prevention, Product safety, Torts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


State banking law -Connecticut Supreme Court holds that statute does not prohibit ATM surcharge fees - Burke v. Fleet National Bank

Article Abstract:

The author is critical of the Connecticut Supreme Court's 1999 decision in Burke v. Fleet National Bank where the court held that the Connecticut Banking Commissioner misinterpreted a state statute when using it to support a prohibition on ATM surcharges.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2000
Connecticut, Banking industry, Cases, Prices and rates, Automated teller machines, Banking law, Bank fees

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Consumer protection
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Paper protection and broken promises: the Airline Deregulation Act's Employee Protection Program. Opening Coase's other black box: why workers submit to vertical integration into firms
  • Abstracts: Middle Rio Grande regional water resource planning: the pitfalls and the promises. Transportation of transuranic nuclear waste to WIPP: a reconsideration of truck versus rail for two sites
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.