Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

'Inherently distinctive' gains new clarification

Article Abstract:

The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals sought in its recent ruling in Knitwaves, Inc. v Lollytogs Ltd. to clarify the protections brought by a product's trade dress. The controversy arose in part from that court's decision in Paddington Corp. v Attiki Importers & Distributors Inc., which in this case it declined to follow on the grounds that Paddington involved packaging whereas Knitwaves concerned a product's features. It used the reasoning set forth in Duraco Products v Joy Plastic Enterprises Ltd., but not that ruling's three-part test.

Author: Werbin, Barry, Fairman, Darlene
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Knitting Mills, Knit Goods, Apparel Knitting Mills, Industrial design

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Cases suggest iMacs' trade dress merits protection; the recognizable shape, colors and translucency will likely be found inherently distinctive

Article Abstract:

Suits by the Apple Corp against corporations it claims to have misappropriated the Apple iMac trade dress are discussed. The iMac has been widely sold and has won many design awards, and Apple has filed such suits against corporations including Future Power Inc, eMachines Inc, and Sotec Co.

Author: Cooley, Ronald B., Brady, Matthew O., Campagna, Mark V.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
Apple iMac (PowerPC-based system)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Boundaries of trade dress may soon be realigned; case argued before high court this term could go well beyond 'Wal-Mart' in limiting scope

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court's tightening of the standard for trade dress protection in Wal-Mart Stores v. Samara Bros. and Traffix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., a pending case further limiting the eligibility of product configuarations for trademark protection, are discussed.

Author: Coston, William D., Saad, Martin L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2001

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Trade dress (Trademark law), Trade dress
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Traditional meaning of 'collapse' is undermined; insurers should heed the trend among courts to adopt a broad definition in coverage disputes
  • Abstracts: Dangerous dedication; studies suggest long hours, productivity pressures can cause serious health problems and a higher suicide rate for attorneys
  • Abstracts: Pervasive professionalism must be part of legal education. Taking professionalism seriously; the president of the American Bar Association outlines six criteria for lawyers to follow in the pursuit of excellence
  • Abstracts: 'Shorter is better' is his philosophy; insurance litigation's goal should be to convince juries carriers should be allies
  • Abstracts: The conception that the corporation is a nexus of contracts, and the dual nature of the firm. Measuring the domain of mediating hierarchy: how contestable are U.S. public corprations?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.