Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Intent is needed for workplace bias

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court has heard oral argument in the race discrimination case of St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks. The plaintiff in this case claims his discharge for misconduct was really a discharge for racial reasons. The US 8th Circuit Court of Appeals' finding for the plaintiff, despite an absence of evidence that the employer was motivated by discriminatory intent, does not accord with case law. When employers give reasons other than discrimination for their behavior, the plaintiff's prima facie case disappears and whether the evidence proves intentional discrimination is the only issue left.

Author: Samp, Richard A.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Burden of proof

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


For the record: Lani Guinier in her own words

Article Abstract:

President Bill Clinton on Jun 3, 1993, withdrew the nomination of Lani Guinier to head the civil rights division of the Justice Department. Ms. Guinier is a University of Pennsylvania Law School professor who worked in the civil rights division during the Carter years and also headed the Voting Rights Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. She has argue in law review articles that voting rights litigation ultimately failed in the civil rights movement's mission to transform politics and empower minorities, and suggested other ways to empower them.

Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Laws, regulations and rules, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Suffrage, Voting rights, Guinier, Lani

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Wards Cove loophole is an outrage

Article Abstract:

The Civil Rights Act of 1991 contained an exemption proposed by Senator Frank Murkowski of Alaska, the state which is home to the Wards Cover cannery. The exemption applied to discrimination cases filed before Mar 1, 1975 and decided after Oct 30, 1983. The Wards Cove plaintiffs are continuing their legal fight and a group including minority, civil rights, community and labor organizations is lobbying Congress for a repeal of the Wards Cove exemption.

Author: Chin, Stephen C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Employment discrimination, Race discrimination
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Contract for nonbeneficial use: New Mexico water law is drowned out by contract. Who controls New Mexico's acequinas? Acequina government and Wilson v. Denver
  • Abstracts: The decline of corporate-owned life insurance for the closely-held business owner
  • Abstracts: Can business score more for the poor? Year in and year out: a BSR retrospective. The corporate responsibility hall of fame
  • Abstracts: Pay for performance. The year of the proactive director: recent developments in the performance and compensation of outside directors
  • Abstracts: After Kaye Scholer: the risks of regulatory and corporate lawyers. part 2 Insider trading after Chestman
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.