Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Issue of physician-assisted suicide confronted by courts and legislatures

Article Abstract:

Appellate litigation and state laws suggest that physician-assisted suicide is becoming more acceptable in the eyes of the law, but much confusion over the issue still exists. The Ninth Circuit ruled in Compassion in Dying that a Washington state law barring physician assisted-suicide violated due process rights. The Second Circuit in Quill held that competent people have a constitutional right to choose assisted suicide. The Oregon Death with Dignity Act allows physicians to prescribe lethal doses of drugs, but is bogged down by procedural rules.

Author: English, David M.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1996
Oregon

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Supreme Court upholds state statutes barring physician-assisted suicide

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court has ruled the Constitution does not guarantee a citizen's right to a physician's assistance in suicide, but this does not settle debate on the issue. The court's Jun 26, 1997 in Vacco v. Quill and Washington v. Glucksbergruling permits states to decide under what circumstances assisted suicide may occur. The cases only applied to competent and terminally ill patients but not to patients whose chronic pain cannot be relieved by prescribed drugs.

Author: English, David M.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1997
Offices & clinics of medical doctors, Physicians & Surgeons, Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists), Suicide Victims, Physicians, Medical professions, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act adopted

Article Abstract:

Maine and New Mexico adopted the Uniform Health-Care Decision Act in 1995. The Act provides guidance on the appointment of healthcare agents, and the ability of family members and friends to make health-related decisions for others. Both states adopted versions of the Act that differ slightly from the original. These differences are discussed.

Author: English, David M.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1996
Medical care decision-making authority (Law), Medical care decision making authority (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Assisted suicide, Elder law, states
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: What's left of the single economic interest theory? The Cottage Savings regulations. Equity index swaps: an uncertain future
  • Abstracts: Impact of rating service on term insurance. Vanishing life insurance premium continues to be misunderstood by many planners and insurers
  • Abstracts: A hybrid solution. Standard terms and conditions. Timeslips flying solo: timekeeping program takes aim at small firms but still needs some work
  • Abstracts: Respective scope of the substance over form theory and transfer pricing in a French audit. Arm's length principle, exit tax and commensurate with income standard: some practical thoughts on the new German transfer pricing rule 2008
  • Abstracts: Special commissioners withdraw reference to ECJ on CFC legislation. AG rules on CFC legislation in Cadbury Schweppes case
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.