Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

"It's not my job to care": understanding Justice Scalia's method of statutory interpretation through Sweet Home and Chevron

Article Abstract:

Justice Antonin Scalia believes that judges are ill-suited to decide the societal or environmental good and that judges who let their environmentalism interfere with objective statutory interpretation intrude improperly on the other two governmental branches. To Justice Scalia, the majority's opinion in Sweet Home is an example of such an intrusion. The theme of the Sweet Home ruling was the proper reading of the Endangered Species Act. The majority opinion advocated deferring to the Fish and Wildlife Service reading of the law, the law itself being ambiguous. Scalia found the law very clear and did not think such deferral was necessary.

Author: Sheldon, Karin P.
Publisher: Boston College Law School
Publication Name: Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0190-7034
Year: 1997
Analysis, Judges, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Judicial review, Scalia, Antonin

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Steamrolling Section 7(d) of the Endangered Species Act: how sunk costs undermine environmental regulation

Article Abstract:

Both public and private developers use sunk costs to get around environmental laws despite their prohibition in Section 7(d) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Court decisions on the tactic show an unwillingness to realize its effect in subverting environmental protection. The courts must become stricter enforcers of environmental policy at a time when public opinion is being silenced by the voice of private industry.

Author: Kopf, Jeffrey S.
Publisher: Boston College Law School
Publication Name: Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0190-7034
Year: 1996
Environmental policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Statutory redundancy: why Congress should overhaul the Endangered Species Act to exclude critical habitat designation

Article Abstract:

The Endangered Species Act protects species listed as endangered. It also required federal agencies to ensure that they do not harm any "critical habitats." These two principles are redundant and the "critical habitat" requirement should be removed from the Act.

Author: Scarpello, Robert J.
Publisher: Boston College Law School
Publication Name: Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0190-7034
Year: 2003
Administration of Conservation Programs, Endangered Species, Evaluation, Habitat (Ecology), Powers and duties, Habitats, Administrative agencies, Government agencies, Environmental law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Endangered species, Protection and preservation, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Metademocracy: the changing structure of legitimacy in statutory interpretation. Why Learned Hand would never consult legislative history today
  • Abstracts: Predicting unethical behavior: a comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior
  • Abstracts: New spy act to boost white-collar defense biz: enhanced enforcement of trade secret theft expected. Prior-invention rights: the excluded middle
  • Abstracts: Barnes v Addy: the requirements of knowledge. Corporate benefit in relation to guarantees and third party mortgages
  • Abstracts: Punching the clock is not so simple;an old statute holds new perils for employers, as workers increasingly sue, alleging wage and hour violations
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.