Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Joint imaging-data base systems could create savings opportunities; data bases and imaging systems can be shared easily, even with opposing parties, to cut costs

Article Abstract:

Imaging systems can dramatically lower the costs of discovery and document management in litigation, particularly in document-intensive cases. A firm can offer to share the expenses and the benefits with co-counsel, or even opposing counsel, though a well-thought-out agreement is advisable. Such a system, which electronically stores the image of a document in the computer, saves costs in storage and document management, eliminates refiling, and allows simultaneous viewing. It can also simplify courtroom presentation.

Author: Lee, Joseph D., Willbur, Wayne A.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Methods, Management, Document management systems, Imaging systems, Database administration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Document assembly systems promote efficiency

Article Abstract:

Recent word processors and other software promise new efficiencies in legal writing, making it possible to recapture more work for later use. The firm's master plan should include a document design team to gather a firm-wide representative writing sample and develop an outline of standardized paragraph forms for each major document type. The initial conversion process is time-consuming for each attorney, but the benefits include great savings in document-preparation time, consistency, and better-looking documents.

Author: Blacksberg, Robert L., Kiefer, David E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Legal composition

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Court nixes fees for fact witnesses; because of the lack of clear precedent, the N.J. federal court decision may affect corporate litigation strategy nationwide

Article Abstract:

A New Jersey federal court ruled that parties to a suit may not pay fact witnesses for services rendered in connection with the preparation of their testimony. This ruling runs contrary to rulings on prior cases and formal opinions by organizations such as the American Bar Association on the subject of litigation consultants. Litigation strategies will need to be modified accordingly.

Author: Sher, J. Elizabeth, Coleman, Ronald D.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Attorneys, Economic aspects, Laws, regulations and rules, Lawyers, Trial practice, Witnesses, Evidence, Expert, Expert evidence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Usage, Information technology services, Technology application, Law offices, Legal services, Litigation support
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Handling estate tax disputes with the IRS. Planning opportunities for notes receivable in an estate
  • Abstracts: Client service can pay off; using old-fashioned courtesy, customer tracking, surveys and focus groups, law firms can retain clients and gain new ones
  • Abstracts: For in-house counsel, safety in numbers; survey shows Ernst & Young's legal department cutback not typical. More firms offer benefits for gay couples: managers say fairness concerns prompted change; low cost was a surprise
  • Abstracts: Can a lawyer insist on clients of one gender? Fluttering eyes won't cut it with law clients. Career progress, yes; equality, not quite yet
  • Abstracts: Congress asked to lower crack penalities: Reno, citing drug's impact, opposes Sentencing Commission proposal. The unflappable Janet Reno: unruffled by criticism, the nation's first female attorney general says she looks to challenges ahead, not back
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.