Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Judge oks 'violence' act, the commerce clause is invoked to sustain the Violence Against Women Act

Article Abstract:

The 1995 Connecticut federal court case of Doe v. Doe is the first spousal abuse case based on the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. Federal district Judge Janet B. Arterton denied a motion to dismiss the case based on Lopez restrictions of commerce clause authority. The rationale which Lopez used for striking down the Gun Free School Zones Act of 1990 is weak because the case did involve a gun which is a connection to interstate commerce. The weak rationale leaves the Doe case subject to reversal.

Author: Rovella, David E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Interstate commerce, Abused women

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Judge Sarokin decries criticism of bench, quits; 3d Circuit judge says some are seeking to 'Willie Hortonize' the courts

Article Abstract:

Judge H Lee Sarokin of the 3d US Circuit Court of Appeals announced on June 4, 1996, his resignation, citing Republican attacks on federal judges in general and himself in particular. Likely Republican presidential nominee Bob Dole attacked Sarokin in an Apr 19, 1996 speech. Academic experts say the resignation is unprecedented and threatens to change the nature of judge-bashing by showing it can actually drive the target from office. Now, they fear, competent judges may be hounded off the bench.

Author: Rovella, David E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Officials and employees, Judges, Appointments, resignations and dismissals, United States. Court of Appeals for the 3d Circuit, Sarokin, H. Lee

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Roy Black comes to his own defense; Marv Albert's lawyer is joined by others who say Judge Kendrick ruled incorrectly

Article Abstract:

Marv Albert's defense attorney, Roy Black was less than humbled by his defeat in court. Admitting he stumbled, but pointing a finger at the judges handling of the case, Mr. Black accepted his first major defeat in an otherwise unblemished criminal defense career still convinced of the strength of the defense's case.

Author: Rovella, David E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Sports Teams and Clubs, Sports clubs, managers, & promoters, Professional Sports, Criminal Law NEC, Analysis, Criminal law, Defense (Criminal procedure), New York (State), Albert, Marv

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Panoply of laws applies to employees' addictions; employers face a myriad of legal hurdles in responding to workers' substance abuse
  • Abstracts: Franchise commentary. Some remarks on the Federal Fair Franchise Practices Act. New Iowa franchise law: franchisors (and franchisees) beware
  • Abstracts: No coattails; the Rodney King tape hasn't made it easier to sue for police brutality. Lawmaking by amateurs: initiatives drafted by kitchen-table legislators can have perverse results
  • Abstracts: An ounce of prevention. The Federal Reserve and investment policies for insurers
  • Abstracts: Right to die too complex for court. Treat HMOs as insurance entities, not medics. High court must hear assisted suicide case
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.