Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Judicial review of natural resource damage assessments under CERCLA: implications of the right to trial by jury

Article Abstract:

Suits under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) should not follow the Dept of the Interior's administrative assessment model but instead should be civil litigation to satisfy the right to trial by jury and congressional intent that natural resource damages be heard de novo by courts. The Interior has developed regulations that rely on trustees to make determinations about damage that has occurred. Assuming that jury trials were intended to be available under CERCLA, the trustee's assessments usurp the jury's role as fact finders.

Author: Elbaum, David
Publisher: New York University Law Review
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1995
Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Liability for environmental damages, Administrative procedure, Right to trial by jury

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The majoritarian difficulty: elective judiciaries and the rule of law

Article Abstract:

The election of judges conflicts with the constitutional principle of an independent judiciary that protects minority interests. Furthermore, the prevailing models of judicial review are unable to resolve the conflict. Those who advocate judicial elections as a way of increasing accountability have overlooked this majoritarian difficulty. Thus, until further justifications are advanced, the constitutional legitimacy of elective judiciaries is questionable.

Author: Croley, Steven P.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1995
Political aspects, Judicial review, Majorities, Rule of law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Impeaching the Senate's use of trial committees

Article Abstract:

The US Senate's practice of trying impeachments by committee rather than the entire Senate is unconstitutional. The practice is described in Rule 11 of the Senate impeachment rules, and Rule 11 could be challenged in the Supreme Court. The original intent of the founders was for trial evidence to be heard by the full Senate, and due process is also violated by Rule 11 when it permits factfinders to ignore evidence.

Author: Auslander, Rose
Publisher: New York University Law Review
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1992
Powers and duties, United States. Congress. Senate, Impeachments, Impeachment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Analysis, Political questions and judicial power
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Municipal recovery of natural resource damages under CERCLA. The Fourth Amendment warrant requirement in the environmental law context: can imminent harm to the environment justify a warrantless search?
  • Abstracts: The politics of influence: recognizing influence dilution claims under s. 2 of the Voting Rights Act
  • Abstracts: An outline of Mexican labor law. North American Free Trade Agreement: implications for Mexican-American workers
  • Abstracts: Now sixteen could get you life: statutory rape, meaningful consent, and the implications for federal sentence enhancement
  • Abstracts: Subtrusts and reversionary interests: a review of current options. Attitudes of older adults toward long-term health care options
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.