Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Judicial review of procedural compliance

Article Abstract:

The regulatory reform bill, Senate bill 343, includes judicial review provisions that suggest that agency noncompliance with risk assessment or cost-benefit analysis requirements could be grounds for finding agency action to have been arbitrary and capricious. The provision could be read to imply that the agency result must also be in error, but there is no explicit materiality requirement. Inconsistent application of the law may result. Agencies will be burdened with creating more documentation in support of decisions that in turn creates more grounds for appeal.

Author: Levin, Ronald M.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1996
Analysis, Interpretation and construction, Judicial review of administrative acts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Preventive medicine

Article Abstract:

The debate surrounding health care reform in the 103rd Congress highlighted the inattention paid to administrative regulations that should be a necessary part of such all-encompassing policy debates. The public's acceptance of whatever plan is ultimately decided upon will depend in great part on the administrative procedures they come into contact with. Congress should keep this in mind, and not simply hand down a new health care system without thinking of the practical implications of their decisions.

Author: Levin, Ronald M.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1995
Political aspects, Powers and duties, Health care reform, Administrative agencies, Government agencies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


More on direct final rulemaking: streamlining, not corner-cutting

Article Abstract:

Lars Noah's objections to the federal agency practice of making a rule final after publication if there are no objections from the public are refuted. Topics include how direct final rulemaking substantially complies with the Administrative Procedure Act and the good cause exemption to ordinary notice-and-comment procedures.

Author: Levin, Ronald M.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1999
United States, Planning, Innovations, Delegated legislation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Administrative law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Chevron's reduced domain: judicial review of treasury regulations and revenue rulings after Mead. Federal courts in the District of Columbia resurrect service members' right to direct judicial review of personnel actions
  • Abstracts: The future of law office computing.... FAST help for criminal law practitioners. Corporate cost cutting: how large firms and corporate legal departments can reap the benefits of a software investment
  • Abstracts: Double jeopardy law after Rodney King. We the people(s), original understanding, and constitutional amendment
  • Abstracts: Merit moves on. Merit pay and grading at the BBC. Merit pay in education
  • Abstracts: Administration perspectives on the 1995 regulatory reform legislation. Introduction
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.