Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Jurors rise up over principle and their perks: before the revolt at the O.J. trial, panels had defied courts and the law

Article Abstract:

Independent-minded juries have a tradition of seizing considerable legal authority even where judges cannot inform them of their ability to do so. Records of such jury revolts, decisions to follow a moral compass rather than the letter of the law, go back at least 300 years in England, and were among the early acts fomenting the US Revolution. Jury nullification has more recently been tainted by some juries' refusal to find guilty white killers of black victims. Nevertheless, jury revolts remain inevitable.

Author: Cox, Gail Diane
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Behavior, Jury, Juries

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Unlike O.J.'s opponents, most can't afford to sue; that second, civil suit bite is expensive, awards elusive

Article Abstract:

Most victims of crimes and their families cannot afford to file a civil suit after criminal proceedings are over. The Goldman family of O.J. Simpson case fame have started their civil suit one year after the criminal proceedings. Juries in civil cases operate under a 'preponderance of the evidence' rather than a 'beyond a reasonable doubt' standard so the family may stand a better chance. The victims' rights movement encourages civil suits as a way of victim empowerment.

Author: Cox, Gail Diane
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Economic aspects, Justice, Administration of, Administration of justice, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


'Can you believe...': bar scoffs at O.J. trial pace

Article Abstract:

Lawyers and judges nationwide express amazement at the pace and antics of the OJ Simpson trial being conducted in Los Angeles. Many criticize what they call a California attitude, with prosecutors, defense, and Judge Lance Ito all receiving blame. Some also say their local systems compare very favorably, operating more promptly and with greater discipline. At least one lawyer, however, noted that voir dire would have taken longer in his state.

Author: Cox, Gail Diane
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
California

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Simpson, O.J., Analysis, Criminal justice, Administration of, Administration of criminal justice
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Chancellor Allen's jurisprudence and the theory of corporate law. Chancellor Allen, the business judgment rule, and the shareholders' right to decide
  • Abstracts: NCSC gives boost to jury trials: a new program designed to enhance the jury trial process hits the nation. Vehicle black box debate
  • Abstracts: The procedural conditions for the implementation of tax treaty obligations under domestic law. Improving the legitimacy of soft law in EU tax law
  • Abstracts: The application of the strict liability principle to prescription drugs in failure-to-warn cases has spawned divergent case law
  • Abstracts: The World Wide Web of financial gerontology. Life insurance or long-term care insurance? The changing financial burden of middle-agers
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.