Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Justices quiz lawyer on excessive awards review

Article Abstract:

Jonathan S. Abady made his first appellate argument before the US Supreme Court in Gasperini v. Center for Humanities. The case could mark the end of federal appellate review of damages deemed excessive. The 7th Amendment was used as a basis to challenge the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit's ruling. The amendment holds that facts tried by a jury can only be re-examined according to common law. The question is whether the amendment permits review of damages awards where no trial error was made.

Author: Coyle, Marcia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Punies decision gives business potent ammo

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court's ruling in BMW of North America v Gore, an excessive- damages case, is a short-term victory for BMW with unclear long-term implications. It could set a precedent for lower punitive damages, especially when the punitive amount vastly outweighs the compensatory amount. The Court's handling of 18 more punitive damages cases will signal how it wants its decision interpreted by lower courts. Its comparison of statutory penalties to the punitive amount troubles some observers.

Author: Coyle, Marcia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


'BMW' punies ruling may upend Food Lion verdict; appeals experts also say ABC News can turn to the First Amendment

Article Abstract:

ABC News would have both the First Amendment and the US Supreme Court's ruling in BMW v. Gore that a punitive damages award was excessive on its side if it chose to appeal the $5.5mil punitive damages award against it in litigation brought by Food Lion Inc. Newsgathering enjoys constitutional protection, which must be considered when setting the size of punitive damages, even when they are for fraud and trespass.

Author: Coyle, Marcia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Laws, regulations and rules, Grocery industry, Grocery stores, Freedom of the press, Food Lion L.L.C., FDLNA

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Limitation of damages, Limitations of damages, Excessive fines clause (Law), Exemplary damages, Punitive damages
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Best snitches: Illinois lawyers; Land of Lincoln leads the nation in attorneys turning in their peers. A time to disrobe to save your honor
  • Abstracts: Companies on new list more lawyer-intensive; list of firms most in demand has changed little since a year ago
  • Abstracts: The CRT: a primer on maximizing asset value. The charitable remainder trust and closely held business stock. Generation-skipping transfer tax planning and the charitable lead trust
  • Abstracts: 'Tis the season to be marketing; remembering clients with cards or gifts can bring in business in the new year
  • Abstracts: Whose language is it? English-only case could be decided on jurisdictional grounds. Adjusting the focus on cable TV; communications reform law impacts cross-ownership, indecency cases
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.