Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

LBOs, fraudulent transfers revisited

Article Abstract:

In Mellon Bank N.A. v. Metro Communications Inc T/A Metrosports the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a leveraged buyout could not be considered a fraudulent transfer if the target company received indirect economic benefits of equivalent value. This is the first time that courts have seriously considered indirect benefits in assessing fraudulent transfer law codified in Sec. 548 of the Bankruptcy Code. That provision states that a transfer (buyout) can be avoided as fraudulent if it results in the target company being left insolvent or if it does not receive equivalent value for its assets.

Author: Miller, Alan B.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Investment banks, Leveraged buyouts, Bankruptcy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


After MCorp, decisions favor regulators

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court's decision in Federal Reserve v MCorp Financial Inc has strengthened the positions of regulators relative to their Chapter 11 holding companies and non-bank subsidiary creditors. Several decisions following Federal Reserve v MCorp have used the provisions of FIRREA to override injunction provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The conflict arises from the fundamental fact that while FIRREA purports to protect depositors' capital base, the Bankruptcy Code wants to achieve equitable distribution of assets to creditors.

Author: Miller, Alan B., Tannenbaum, Jeffrey L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Bankruptcy reorganizations, Bankruptcy reorganization, Bankruptcy trustees

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Four recent decisions in the Orange County case attempt to balance state sovereignty interests and the goals of Chapter 9

Article Abstract:

Four federal court decisions in cases relating to the bankruptcy filing by Orange County, California, could set important precedents in future Chapter 9 filings. Each concerned the extent of a federal bankruptcy court's authority in light of the 10th Amendment's limitations. One dealt with modifications of collective bargaining agreements, another with the court's ability to protect secured creditors, a third with limits imposed by sec 904 of Chapter 9, and the last with what qualifies as a municipality for Chapter 9 eligibility.

Author: Miller, Alan B., Tanenbaum, Jeffrey L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Public Finance Activities, Public Administration, Bankruptcy Law, Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, County Government, Municipal Govt Liabilities & Debt, United States, California, Local finance, Orange County, California, Municipal bankruptcy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Guns, crime, and academics: some reflections on the gun control debate. Violence, guns, and drugs: a cross-country analysis
  • Abstracts: Strawberry growers pick off a pesticide ban. Astroturf lobbying replaces grassroots organizing. Hazards of Herbicides: Loggers Risk Tomorrow's Trees
  • Abstracts: Japanese are stung on patents; lawyers alarmed by secret meeting rumors. BCCI suit: far-flung, massive; lawyers handle case of astounding dimensions
  • Abstracts: School desegregation cases linger quietly. Unlikely lobby asks for changes in Superfund. Superfund studies begin to fill hole in data-dry field
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.