Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Law-related programs facing ax: State Justice Institute among those targeted by congressional budget-cutters

Article Abstract:

Among the legal education and law-related programs facing a cutoff or sharp reduction in federal funds is the State Justice Institute, the Council on Legal Education Opportunities, the Legal Services Corp, and Law School Clinical Experience. The State Justice Institute survived with its budget cut from $13.5 million to $5 million to maintain its grants to state courts, such as Arizona's QuickCourt legal kiosks. It had no ideological opponents in Congress, though the House argued states should fund state-level programs.

Author: Jost, Kenneth
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Finance, Budget, Budgeting, Budgets, Domestic policy, Government programs, 1996 AD, State Justice Institute

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A funny thing happened on the way to the courthouse: mens rea, document destruction, and the federal obstruction of justice statute

Article Abstract:

The principle of mens rea established in United States v Neiswender is inconsistent with section 1503 of the federal law on obstruction of justice. For example, negligent document destruction could result in prosecution under Neiswender. This mens rea principle also conflicts with Pettibone v United States and other mens rea principles. Congress should pass laws clarifying section 1503, similar to the Model Penal Code, to prevent the harsh use of Neiswender.

Author: De Marco, Joseph V.
Publisher: New York University Law Review
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1992
Analysis, Criminal intent, Obstruction of justice, Legal documents, Evidence spoliation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Debating the future of the Independent Counsel statute

Article Abstract:

The Ethics in Government Act of 1978, commonly called the Independent Counsel statute, will expire in June 1999 unless Congress renews it. Two views prevail: that the statute should be renewed with amendments, and that the statute is too flawed to be amended and should be allowed to expire. An analysis of the statute's flawed rationale, in particular concerning the Department of Justice and the role of checks and balances, supports the second view.

Author: Sargentich, Thomas O.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1999
United States, Special prosecutors

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Funding equal justice: state commissions studying bias in courts hampered by budget constraints. Justice: the new commodity
  • Abstracts: Cause related marketing and corporate philanthropy in the privately held enterprise. Theodore Levitt's marketing myopia
  • Abstracts: Fertility and coercion. The Defense of Marriage Act and the overextension of congressional authority
  • Abstracts: Products liability and "off-label" use of prescription drugs. Realized benefits from switching drugs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.