Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Lawyer fees too high? The case for repealing unauthorized practice of law statutes

Article Abstract:

The "unauthorized practice of law" (UPL) regulation in Arizona provides that it is illegal for anyone to provide legal services if they do not meet the requirements set by the state bar. The statute, believed to be pro-public, is an indication that the legal services is entirely the sole responsibility of the lawyers. Proponents and supporters of the UPL maintain that it simply guarantees that only the competent and qualified law practitioners are allowed to render legal service. However, the UPL is a restrictive regulation since it limits the freedom of individuals to offer voluntary deals. Alternatives to the UPL, such as certifications, have been proposed but they are yet to be fully studied.

Author: Leef, George C.
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1997
Legal services, Offices of Lawyers, Attorneys, Lawyers, Arizona

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Salting the earth: the case for repealing Superfund

Article Abstract:

Companies which have been been ordered to pay the costs of cleaning up hazardous waste landfills are calling for the repeal of the law on Superfund, which was passed in 1980 in response to the Love Canal incident in 1978. However, Congress is deliberating on reforms in the Superfund, instead of working for the oppressive law's repeal. It has been estimated that Superfund will cost the country $4 billion annually, with costs expected to eventually total $400 billion.

Author: Taylor, Jerry
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1995
Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs, Solid Waste Programs, Solid waste disposal, Superfund

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Clouds over Kyoto: the debate over global warming

Article Abstract:

The Kyoto round of talks on global warming policies should prompt regulators to reconsider their position as global warming policies directly affect today's poor while its effects on future generations remains questionable. Scientific evidence does not provide a clear picture of the situation and future generations stand to lose from drops in economic productivity that Kyoto participants are advocating.

Author: Taylor, Jerry
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1998
International Affairs, Intnl Environmental Law, Interpretation and construction, Economic aspects, Political aspects, Global warming, Environmental policy, International environmental law, Environmental law, International

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Soviet files cast doubt on OSI Nazi hunt. Privatized police pose legal questions. Boston blacks hail new DA, first in city
  • Abstracts: BNA 706 Preparer for Windows speeds automated preparation of estate tax returns. NumberCruncher and IRS Factors Calculator perform sophisticated calculations easily and reliably
  • Abstracts: The Zagat recipe for becoming an entrepreneur; the famed restaurant guide creators reveal how lawyers could do what they did
  • Abstracts: Three groupware programs to watch. Using WordPerfect's Compare Documents feature. Personal Assistant in a box?
  • Abstracts: Aids can convince jurors by appealing to senses; studies show that jurors retain facts longer when presented in more than one sensory modality
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.