Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Lawyer liable for coerced sex; jury awards ex-client $225,000 for malpractice despite competent representation

Article Abstract:

A Rhode Island court has found attorney Edmond DiSandro and his firm DiSandro, Smith and Associates guilty of malpractice for forcing a client into a sexual relationship. A client DiSandro represented in a divorce suit charged him with forcing sex under threat of actively trying to deprive her of custody of her child. DiSandro was found guilty of fraud, battery and intentional infliction of mental distress in addition to malpractice. The firm was found liable under the theory of respondeat superior.

Author: Presser, ArLynn Leiber
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Sexual behavior, Attorneys, Lawyers, Malpractice

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Partnership ruling; court reverses sex bias finding

Article Abstract:

Attorney Nancy Ezold was denied partnership at the Philadelphia firm of Wolf, Blcok, Schorr and Solis-Cohen in 1988 and has since about that time been occupied with a suit against the firm for sex discrimination in employment. In Dec 1992, a 3d Circuit court reversed a district court ruling in the case, holding that the men evaluated for partnership at the same time as Ezold all demonstrated superior legal analysis abilities. Ezold and her attorneys have vowed to fight on.

Author: Presser, ArLynn Leiber
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Human resource management, Law firms, Women attorneys, Women lawyers, Sex discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Palimony award for housework; woman claims her cooking, cleaning, food shopping unjustly enriched partner

Article Abstract:

A Wisconsin appellate court has in Walsh v Ray used the unjust enrichment theory to award palimony to a woman who during their eight years of living together did all the housework and substantial home improvement work for her boyfriend. Observers say using the unjust enrichment theory in such a case is unusual and that these cases have normally been based on alleged contracts.

Author: Presser, ArLynn Leiber
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Unmarried couples, Unjust enrichment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Workplace violence generates two kinds of torts; courts are recognizing negligent hiring as a separate cause of action from negligent retention
  • Abstracts: Land tenure and agricultural productivity on Indian reservations. Contract choice in modern agriculture: cash rent versus cropshare
  • Abstracts: $19.60 per client; $28M for lawyers; imbalance of Synthroid settlement is challenged by two state AGs. ABA Task Force pushes for freeze on OTS' powers
  • Abstracts: The lawyer who jammed Microsoft's antitrust deal. ATLA leaders embrace diversity at confab
  • Abstracts: It's a new era for the fund's fallen chief; a judge takes a decidedly dim view of John G. Bennett Jr.'s request for an allowance
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.