Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Low-smoke butt may signal new tobacco gambit: researchers' leaks may mean tobacco industry can't use 'agriculture' defense

Article Abstract:

Disclosures by former tobacco researchers that the tobacco industry has known of the addictive and harmful quality of cigarettes may undermine the industry's ability to use the agricultural products defense as well as the litigation benefit of introducing alternative products. Products liability law provides a defense to manufacturers of agricultural products that cannot be produced more safely. Leaked research reports indicate that tobacco companies knew for decades that a safer product could be produced. No such safety claims are being made regarding the low-smoke cigarettes that R.J. Reynolds is planning to introduce.

Author: Blum, Andrew
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Cigarettes, Cigarette Manufacturing, Health aspects, United States, Cases, Product introduction, Tobacco industry, R.J. Reynolds Industries Inc., Low-smoke cigarettes, Low smoke cigarettes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Secondhand smoke suits may catch fire; some lawyers see an upsurge following a new EPA report

Article Abstract:

Cases alleging personal injuries from passive smoking are the new wave in smoking litigation. They have been given ammunition by an EPA report linking secondhand smoke to lung cancer and by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The EPA report may also occasion new Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations. Moreover, the American Lung Assn has called on all federal agencies to institute a smoking ban.

Author: Blum, Andrew
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Reports, United States. Environmental Protection Agency, Passive smoking

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Out of bounds? Critics on Judge Sarokin

Article Abstract:

Judge H. Lee Sarokin recused himself from Cipollone v Liggett Group after being reassigned from Haines v Liggett Group after an allegedly prejudicial comment and compared himself to the late Judge Sirica of the Watergate Affair. He expressed his worry about the independence of the judiciary if a powerful litigant could cause a judge's removal for making statements supported by the evidence.

Author: Blum, Andrew
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Analysis, Judicial process, Sarokin, H. Lee

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Product liability, Products liability, Tobacco, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Four on the Fourth; high court gets several chances to elaborate on standards for searches and seizures. Projecting an image; court to decide if high-tech heat scan is a search under the Fourth
  • Abstracts: Second wind; tobacco battles shift back to trial courts after justices spare the industry from FDA regulation
  • Abstracts: Smoke gets in your high-rise; tobacco-sensitive tenants increasingly sue over neighbors' nicotine habits. Brainstorming for reform; Commission entertains ideas on changing multijurisdictional practice
  • Abstracts: Let your fingers do the talking; electronic mail can help lawyers stay in touch with clients. Six mistakes lawyers make; misadventures in technoland that needn't happen
  • Abstracts: Jones Day settles malpractice suit; fraud cause resolved after $45.6 million jury verdict. Legal malpractice: punies OK'd
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.