Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Market power in vertical cases

Article Abstract:

The Federal Trade Commission and the courts may base their analysis of vertical nonprice restraints to a substantial degree on the degree of market power present. The US Supreme Court, in its stress on interbrand competition, has used the rule of thumb that if the defendant does not have market power, the plaintiff does not succeed. They reason that if a defendant lacks market power, consumers are free to move to interbrand competition. The market power analysis can also be used in exclusive dealing arrangements and tying agreements.

Author: Arquit, Kevin J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1991
Unfair competition (Commerce), Unfair competition, Vertical integration, Market share

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The boundaries of horizontal restraints: facilitating practices and invitations to collude

Article Abstract:

A finding of restraint of trade by horizontal agreement involves invitations to collude or facilitating practices. The attitude of the FTC on collusion invitations is illustrated by the enforcement case of Quality Trailer Products, No. 911-0068, Aug 6, 1992. The attitude of the FTC on facilitating practices is illustrated by the enforcement cases over infant formula against Mead Johnson, Abbott Laboratories and American Home Products files on Jun 10, 1992.

Author: Arquit, Kevin J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Communication and cooperation among competitors: introduction and overview

Article Abstract:

Antitrust analysis of horizontal arrangements involves basic questions when using either the rule of reason or per se analysis. One question is, what makes an agreement, or, who has agreed to do what? Another question considers what constitutes unreasonable restraint of trade. Per se and rule of reason analysis now fit on a spectrum, with more justification needed for per se.

Author: Shenefield, John H.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Interpretation and construction, Antitrust law, Restraint of trade, Horizontal integration
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Market power in antitrust. Innovations in antitrust enforcement. Is the glass half-empty or half-full?: reflections on the Kodak case
  • Abstracts: Parent trap; corporate mergers and acquisitions can create conflict of interest. It ain't over until ... there's a right way and a wrong way to end client relationships
  • Abstracts: Clean air requires commuting options. Family leave coverage is overestimated. OSHA reform efforts are heating up
  • Abstracts: New rules concerning limitations on U.S. tax benefits from operations in restricted countries. Foreign tax credit limitation rules
  • Abstracts: GM lawsuits pile up in Philly; despite slamming NBC. GM settlement praised, opposed. GM settles suits; turmoil remains; plaintiffs say automaker hides truth about trucks
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.