Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

No-frills approach proving costly; insurers' demands to economize are too much for some defense firms

Article Abstract:

The insurance industry's cost-cutting and cost control efforts are forcing some insurance defense firms to cut their legal staffs, shift them to work in more lucrative areas, and even to shut down. Informal firm surveys indicate insurance defense partners' billing rate to average $130/hr., while their commercial counterparts bill at $250/hr. This results in tension and different compensation packages at the same firms. Experts recommend that lawyers use computers more to succeed in insurance defense. Lawyers also have to know the bottom line to compete for clients.

Author: Samborn, Hope Viner
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Economic aspects, Finance, Insurance industry, Law firms, Defense (Civil procedure)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Going for broke; soaring bankruptcies prompt calls for new repayment plan

Article Abstract:

Every US judicial district has seen an increase in consumer bankruptcies in 1996, and they constitute 95% of the 1 mil bankruptcies expected to be filed this year. These filings are paradoxical since unemployment is low and the economy appears to be in good shape. Many observers think the cause is the ready availability of consumer credit, while a controversial study attributes it to insurance coverage and divorce. A Bankruptcy Review Commission will issue a 1997 report recommending reforms to bankruptcy law.

Author: Samborn, Hope Viner
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Statistics, Debtor and creditor, Bankruptcy, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Scrutiny scrutinized; case sparks debate on intermediate standard

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Virginia that the male-only admissions policy of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) violated the constitutional guarantee of equal protection, thus overturning a ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit. Some feminists fear the heightened scrutiny the decision calls for may provide fodder for reverse discrimination plaintiffs seeking to attack affirmative action programs, some of which have the goal of giving women parity with men.

Author: Samborn, Hope Viner
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Equality before the law, Equal protection, Military education, Single-sex schools, Single sex schools

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Self-referral regs prompt second look; physicians' practices and pay likely to be restructured. Antitrust defenses in physician peer review cases
  • Abstracts: Clearing up before moving on: conflicts of interest increase complications when switching firms. Three-way street: discord between insurers and insureds puts defense lawyers on perilous path
  • Abstracts: No: the remedy lies in state court. Yes: it's time to declare war on spouse abuse. No: grandstanding does not offer a solution
  • Abstracts: In the recently passed appropriations bill, Congress clarified when lenders and fiduciaries are liable under CERCLA for cleanup of property held as collateral
  • Abstracts: The 'joint work' provision of the Copyright Act could be used by companies to assert authorship of certain works not covered by 'work for hire' arrangements
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.