Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

No longer news; the trial of the century that wasn't

Article Abstract:

Former Panamanian leader Manuel Noriega's drug trafficking trial did not meet media expectations of a fascinating case which would reveal some of the embarrassments in US foreign policy over the last ten years. Reasons include limited news media financing, the need to have much of the testimony translated from Spanish, the ban on courtroom cameras, and the length of the trial. The judge would not allow information about US foreign policy into evidence unless it was directly relevant to the Noriega case, and the prosecutors seemed to want to limit media coverage.

Author: Doppelt, Jack
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Cases, Drug traffic, Noriega, Manuel Antonio

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Don't get trampled by media circus: basing our approach to court coverage on isolated trials only hurts the system

Article Abstract:

Public and media access to courtrooms should not be compromised based on exceptional trials like the first O.J. Simpson trial. It is possible that the media did have an adverse effect on the judge, jury and attorneys in the Simpson trial, but the public should also have the opportunity to see how effectively justice operates in many other trials. Allowing the press access to trials promotes the legitimacy of the legal system through demonstrating its fairness and ensuring accountability.

Author: Cooper, N. Lee
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Justice, Administration of, Administration of justice, Public opinion, Cameras in the courtroom, Cameras in court, President's Page

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Secret justice; undisclosed settlements to lawsuits and closed-door proceedings shut out public scrutiny, reduce accountability and eliminate precedent. But that is just the way some litigants want it

Article Abstract:

When judges employ secretive measures such as closing files and sealing courtrooms they erode public oversight and confidence in the judicial system. Media lawyers form the front line in the battle against secretive judges, and across the US they report increased problems in obtaining access to court records and documents. Judges are often unaware of the requirements of constitutional and other civil law when they close court proceedings to the public because that is how parties want it.

Author: Gibeaut, John
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Public and closed trials, Right to public trial

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Free press and fair trial, Pretrial publicity, Right to fair and impartial trial, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Don't leave home without it ... your office, that is. What is your computer hiding? For those who know where to look, the information is still there
  • Abstracts: No coattails; the Rodney King tape hasn't made it easier to sue for police brutality. Lawmaking by amateurs: initiatives drafted by kitchen-table legislators can have perverse results
  • Abstracts: Shoring up malpractice insurance; the importance of prior acts coverage and extended reporting endorsements. The right amount of coverage: taking inventory of risks helps determine malpractice insurance limits
  • Abstracts: Haiti and the validity of international action. Protecting indigenous rights in international adjudication. The constitutional crisis in the United Nations
  • Abstracts: Tribunal liberates Victorian newsagents and sub-agents. Exercising contractual rights and imposing restrictive conditions - a misuse of market power?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.