Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

No sudden impact; courts rejecting mental disability claims despite EEOC guidelines intended to protect mentally ill

Article Abstract:

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is not protecting the mentally ill when they go to court with claims of discrimination. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission guidelines strengthen the rights of the mentally ill in the workplace, yet employers have still won 32 of 37 mental disability suits published in 1997. They also won 26 of 30 motions for dismissal at the trial stage, and 6 of 7 appellate rulings. The courts sometimes even turn down mental disability claims without addressing whether accommodating the disability would have caused the employer undue hardship.

Author: Higgins, Michael
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Cases, Mentally ill persons, Mentally ill, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Something in the genes: EEOC takes steps to forestall discrimination for predisposition to illness

Article Abstract:

An EEOC compliance manual for the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) issued in 1995 includes those with a genetic susceptibility to an illness in the ranks of the handicapped for ADA purposes. According to the ADA, employers may do genetic screening after a conditional job offer only if all new employees in the same job category are screened. Not offering an employee health insurance due to a pre-existing condition is so far permissible under the ADA as long as there was no subterfuge to evade the goals of the law.

Author: Lord, Dee
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Positively truthful; appeal asks whether doctors have duty to disclose HIV status to patients

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court used the 1998 case of Abbott v. Bragdon to rule that the Americans with Disabilities Act protects HIV-infected dental patients, and the case is one of the first to raise to issue of whether a medical professional's HIV-positive status can give rise to a legal claim. Most of the 16 states which have considered AIDS phobia issues have stated that only plaintiffs with evidence of actual HIV exposure could bring a claim.

Author: Baker, Debra
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
HIV patients

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Standards, United States, Discrimination against disabled persons, Handicapped discrimination, United States. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Circuit courts are split on whether discrimination claims can be compelled to arbitration when collective bargaining agreements include arbitration clauses
  • Abstracts: Where the 'big boxes' belong; city planning commissions have devised various solutions to the problem of zoning big retailers
  • Abstracts: Although employers' restrictions on relationships between employees can give rise to claims, some restraints on office romances may withstand challenge. part 2
  • Abstracts: The comptroller of the currency has been taking measures that will offer some latitude to national banks that want to offer insurance
  • Abstracts: ERISA; it's more places than you thought it could be; the federal law that most people know by its acronym does more than protect retirement incomes. It touches virtually every lifestyle matter a lawyer could handle for a client
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.