Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Noncompetition agreements in bankruptcy: covenants (maybe) not to compete

Article Abstract:

Noncompetition agreements are less firm due to confusion over Bankruptcy Code section 365(a) concerning the rejection of executory contracts which courts are interpreting to throw out the noncompetition agreements in the rejected contracts. This philosophy needs to be corrected by Congress, who should allow the contracts to be rejected but maintain the noncompetition agreements because the inability to secure a firm noncompetition agreement may make companies less willing to invest in employees.

Author: Sharer, Jeffrey C.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1995
Non-competition agreements, Noncompete agreements, Breach of contract

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Obtaining jurisdiction over states in bankruptcy proceedings after Seminole Tribe

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court's decision in Seminole Tribe v. Florida allowing states to claim 11th Amendment immunity in bankruptcy litigation reduces the bankruptcy courts' jurisdiction over the states. Bankruptcy Code provisions, however, such as the automatic stay would still apply, limiting Seminole's effects. Courts can further reduce Seminole's negative effects by determining the scope of the waiver for immunity and by enjoining individual state officials under the Ex parte Young doctrine.

Author: Goebel, Teresa K.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1998
Government liability, Jurisdiction, Federal-state controversies, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Why it pays to file for bankruptcy: a critical look at the incentives under U.S. personal bankruptcy law and a proposal for change

Article Abstract:

The US bankruptcy code encourages wealthy households to file for bankruptcy including those with apparent ability to meet their debt obligations. Reforms should include combining Chapters 7 and 13 and restructuring the asset exemption provisions. These changes would deter wealthier households from seeking to financially benefit from filing personal bankruptcy petitions.

Author: White, Michelle J.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1998
Financial planning

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Bankruptcy law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Enforcing restrictive franchise covenants in bankruptcy and beyond. Summary of the LaFalce legislation
  • Abstracts: Proof of the meeting competition defense: investigation and verification of reported competing offers. Intercompetitor cooperation in the petroleum industry
  • Abstracts: Disproportionate investment of plan assets in residential mortgages not imprudent. Mortgage loans from bank under program established by pension trustees not subject to s. 72(p)
  • Abstracts: Commentary. Themes in Warren Court biographies. Judicial biography: history, myth, literature, fiction, potpourri
  • Abstracts: The private sector in perspective - 1994/95. Threat of surge in pay settlements recedes. The private sector in perspective - 1995/96
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.