Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Nonmutual issue preclusion against states

Article Abstract:

State and US circuit courts have properly questioned the categorical rule regarding nonmutual issue preclusion against sovereignties, including states, that the US Supreme Court established in 1984 in United States v. Mendoza. Generally, state governments should be immune from this type of issue preclusion. The law of nonmutual issue preclusion should allow courts to decide cases based on specific facts that may justify overriding the presumption. Courts departing from Mendoza have considered judicial economy, development of law, federalism and other factors.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1996
Case Note, State government, Res judicata, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The sovereign immunity "exception." (The Supreme Court, 1995 Term)

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court's ruling in Seminole Tribe v. Florida is unlikely to strengthen the doctrine of state sovereignty, despite the majority's apparent attempt to do so. The Court upheld dismissal of a private suit against a state in federal court under federal Indian gaming law based on antiquated precedent that characterizes such suits as violations of state sovereignty. While some symbolic value may attach to the Court's decision, state officers are generally subject to the jurisdiction of federal courts.

Author: Monaghan, Henry Paul
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1996
Sovereignty, Federal-state controversies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Section 5 and the protection of nonsuspect classes after City of Boerne v. Flores

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court in City of Boerne v, Flores did not noticeably limit Congress' ability to abrogate state sovereign immunity regarding legislation which safeguards nonsuspect classes. Lower court decisions in American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) cases continued after Boerne to give deference to Congress' interpretation of the 14th Amendment's section 5. Boerne does not specifically address ADA or ADEA.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
Equality before the law, Equal protection, Legislative power

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Government liability, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Ethical decision making and community investment. The wide world of corporate philanthropy
  • Abstracts: Globally, best trade secret protection is oneself; around the world, statutory protection is improving, but enforcement is spotty at best
  • Abstracts: Patent due diligence helps ensure exclusivity; areas of inquiry should include inventorship status and rights assignments or reservations
  • Abstracts: Syringe-exchange programs in the United States: where are we now? The use of condoms in the presence of HIV risk: the role of economic and epidemiological variables
  • Abstracts: Still worthy of praise. Flawed foundations: the philosophical critique of (a particular type of) economics
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.