Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Not-so-big issues; sorting through little-noted decisions from the Court's last term

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court's 1992-1993 term included decisions which generated little publicity. These included Eighth Amendment cases on 'excessive fines' and 'cruel and unusual punishment.' The term was also marked by a fraying of the justices' usual veneer of civility in TXO Production Corp v. Alliance Resources Corp, a case on the constitutionality of a punitive damages award. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents may win an award for peculiarity since it presented the judges with the question of when a statute ceases to be a statute.

Author: Stewart, David O.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
United States. Supreme Court, 1993 AD

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Shutting the door; decisions impose new burdens on aliens seeking a home in the United States

Article Abstract:

Recent Supreme Court decisions indicate a tendency to give the executive branch great power over immigration matters. Baker v Haitian Refugee Center stayed a court order blocking the forced return of Haitians fleeing political repression. INS v Elias-Zacarias narrowed the definition of political persecution. INS v Doherty gave the attorney general broad discretion to decide whether to reopen a deportation. Employment of aliens contesting their deportation and legal fees for aliens' counsel were restricted in other decisions.

Author: Stewart, David O.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Cases, Political aspects, Illegal immigrants, Deportation, Emigration and immigration law, Immigration law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Prisoner rights rebound; inmates score victories in recent Supreme Court decisions

Article Abstract:

The 1991-92 US Supreme Court term has seen the justices agreeing with prisoners about violations of their constitutional rights in a number of cases. Chief Justice Rehnquist sided with the majority in all the pro-prisoner decisions, while Justice Thomas accused his colleagues of turning the Eighth Amendment into a law of prison regulation. These pro-prisoner decisions are particularly surprising in view of the court's conservative criminal justice views in other areas, such as the stress on confining habeas corpus review.

Author: Stewart, David O.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Sentences (Criminal procedure), Prisoners, Prisoners' rights

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Establishment Clause - school vouchers - Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. Constitutional law - Sixth Circuit holds that school voucher program violates the Establishment Clause
  • Abstracts: New product liability bills; congressional effort to supplant state laws resumes. Hard time; mandatory minimum sentencing comes under congressional scrutiny
  • Abstracts: Courts battle over Harris execution; an impatient Supreme Court orders an end to last-minute stays by 9th Circuit
  • Abstracts: When Rubin sues, defendants settle; unscrupulous debt collectors pay the bills for New Mexico consumer lawyer
  • Abstracts: Some university fees voluntary; like lawyers, students don't have to fund objectionable speech, court rules. Activist spouses seek image change; faced with membership decline, Lawyers Auxiliary tries to reverse the trend
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.