Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

PRPs can avoid some pollution exclusion barriers; potentially responsible parties may show that substances do not meet 'pollutant' definition

Article Abstract:

Potentially responsible parties (PRPs) can make valid legal arguments to obtain coverage for EPA claims under liability insurance policies. A settlement with insurance companies should be possible if the PRP knows its legal rights. The insurance company will first investigate factual matters in a PRP's EPA claim and will probably deny coverage or a duty to defend based on a pollution exclusion clause in the policy. After completing this process, the carrier may agree to defend the claim, but an initial denial based on a pollution exclusion clause in the policy is much more likely.

Author: Callahan, Daniel J., Dunham, Kathleen
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Toxic torts, Hazardous waste sites

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


New encryption rules relax some restrictions; the regulations make it easier for exporters to avoid licenses but still require agency review

Article Abstract:

The Bureau of Exchange and Export Administration (BXA) has primary authority for the regulation of cryptographic technology although, to meet concerns of the national security and law enforcement communities, there is also an interagency review process involving the Departments of State and Defense, the National Security Agency and the FBI. Any one of these agencies can stop the issuance of a license. Amendments to BXA rules announced at the end of 1998 purport to liberalize matters.

Author: Dayanim, Behnam
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Safety and security measures, Data encryption, Electronic commerce, E-commerce

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Will architectural works law have a chilling effect? Designers worry that 1990 act will force them to add original elements just to avoid liability

Article Abstract:

The effect of the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act (AWCP Act), passed to make US copyright law accord with the Berne Convention, are discussed. The AWCP Act discusses which elements of a typical architectural design copyright does not protect and what protection exists for derivative architectural works.

Author: Greenstreet, Robert, Klingaman, Russell A.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2001

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Risks of EPLI coverage prove difficult to assess; employment practices liability insurance presents risk factors not found in other policy forms
  • Abstracts: Is America an indispensable (global) nation? Voluntary disclosure of mission statements in corporate annual reports: signaling what and to whom?
  • Abstracts: Business is way too eager to settle. Violations of COPPA continue; most companies don't comply, says one study; FTC has taken action
  • Abstracts: IP poses opportunities during economic straits; the Asian economic crisis is no time to ignore patents: valuable assets with lengthy lifespans
  • Abstracts: 'Qualitex' makes visible the strategic spectrum; corporate 'color warriors' have various tactics at their disposal
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.