Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Peace in the war between federal antitrust notification and bankruptcy asset sales? A survey of the reformed s. 363(b)(2)(B)

Article Abstract:

Congress attempted to resolve the conflicts between the Bankruptcy Code section 363(b)(2)(B) and the Hart-Scott-Rodino Improvements Act of 1976 involving the antitrust implications of a bankruptcy liquidation in the 1994 Bankruptcy Reform Act. The reform extends the waiting period after federal antitrust premerger notification from 10 days to 15 days with a possible 10-day extension to allow for antitrust investigation. However, this reform fails to resolve the more compelling issue of jurisdiction over the sale if antitrust issues are raised.

Author: Bernstein, Janet
Publisher: Emory Baptist Church
Publication Name: Bankruptcy Developments Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0890-7862
Year: 1995
United States, Antitrust law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The parameters of the non-plan liquidating Chapter Eleven: refining the Lionel standard

Article Abstract:

The guidelines for non-plan liquidations which came from Committee of Equity Security Holders v Lionel Corp remain apt although some limitations exist. The guidelines apply to Chapter 11 bankruptcies under section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. One improvement would be for courts to ask whether sales should be handled by debtors-in-possession rather than trustees.

Author: Bodoh, William T., Kennedy, John W., Mulligan, Joseph P.
Publisher: Emory Baptist Church
Publication Name: Bankruptcy Developments Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0890-7862
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Postconfirmation modification of Chapter 13 plans: a sheep in wolf's clothing

Article Abstract:

Standards are needed for application of section 1329 of the Bankruptcy Code covering postconfirmation modification. Courts have given inconsistent interpretations, especially involving res judicata. A uniform standard would comprise two steps, one for ascertaining if circumstances have changed, and another for evaluating the ability to pay under the proposal.

Author: Deffebach, Harry L.
Publisher: Emory Baptist Church
Publication Name: Bankruptcy Developments Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0890-7862
Year: 1992
Analysis, Res judicata

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Bankruptcy law, Liquidation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Back to the drawing board: the settlement class action and the limits of Rule 23
  • Abstracts: Not in the corporation's best interests. Class wars: the dilemma of the mass tort class action
  • Abstracts: Insurance policy may be an ideal asset for a gift by the insured. Long-term care insurance helps preserve an estate
  • Abstracts: S & L suits: unjust, yes but coming to an end. The foreclosure must go on: L.A. bankruptcy judges give the hook to 'artful dodger' debtors
  • Abstracts: The future of labor relations in the federal sector. Labor-management cooperation: in need of an implicit or explicit agreement
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.