Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Powers of persuasion: how you argue will affect whether the judge sees things your way

Article Abstract:

Many lawyers lose motions by creating arguments with the judge rather than to the judge, forcing judges into the role of opponents. The better way to win motions is to offer facts early on, when many judges make up their minds, and to do so briefly and in clear language tailored to the individual judge. Short, memorable statements or memos will get attention and stick in the memory. Judges consider cases theirs, not the lawyers', and they do discuss lawyers among themselves.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Analysis, Persuasion (Rhetoric)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Over-the-top arguments; lawyers can cause trouble for themselves by going too far

Article Abstract:

Trial lawyers may have a difficult time persuading angry clients who like their lawyer to play it rough that they can almost guarantee posturing, angry witnesses who destroy their cases and can make settlement impossible. Calling in another lawyer or other consultant familiar with this sort of case may help convince such a client of reality. The "adversary" system itself at times makes lawyers think that they are doing their job better the more adversarial they are.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Judge trials; litigation techniques for trying the case to the court

Article Abstract:

Attorneys need to alter their methods of argumentation in trials without juries. Judges often complain that lawyers don't argue the whole case to them. Attorneys need to be complete, making full opening and closing statements. Lawyers also should heed the rules of witness order and remember that the 'jury' in a bench trial cannot see the face of the witness. Overall, attorneys need to guard against an overly casual atmosphere impeding their clients' rights.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Methods, United States, Trial practice, Forensic oratory
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: International anti-trust cooperation: wave of the future. One market, one money, one law. A US-inspired EU antitrust revolution
  • Abstracts: If Dahmer's not crazy, who is? Colleagues aided Dahmer prosecutor. Dahmer Dilemma
  • Abstracts: A checklist of steps to help protect you from an errors and omissions lawsuit. Most policyholders should emerge "whole" as sale of Executive Life to investors is approved
  • Abstracts: Kirkland & Ellis partners depart; to form new boutique. 'Invasion' of Chicago stops cold; in the end, just a few outside firms dared to enter
  • Abstracts: The great divide: a proposal to create a section to study gay and lesbian issues brings discord to the Texas bar
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.