Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Pregnancy dismissal was unlawful sex discrimination

Article Abstract:

The House of Lords decision in Webb v. EMO Air Cargo held that dismissal of pregnant employees is direct sex discrimination if, as in Webb, the employee was recruited for an indefinite period but temporarily unavailable due to pregnancy. However, the decision seems to be drawn from the particular facts of the case, implying that employers can dismiss a pregnant employee specifically recruited for a fixed period without liability for direct discrimination, if the employee becomes unavailable. Sex discrimination cases may begin to focus more on these elements of fixed-term and indefinite employment, in light of this decision.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1995
Employment, Pregnant women, Sex discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Interception of employee's office telephone calls unlawful

Article Abstract:

The European Court of Human Rights ruling for the plaintiff in Halford v United Kingdom can have far reaching impact on employees' rights to privacy at work. The Court ruled that Ms Halford's right to privacy had been violated by her employer, Merseyside Police Authority, when her office telephone was tapped to gather information to be used in defending against a sex discrimination complaint filed by her. When the UK Government incorporates the provision of the European Convention of Human Rights into domestic legislation this case will become an important precedent.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1997
Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy, Workers, European Union

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Reduced share of service charges was unlawful deduction

Article Abstract:

The Employment Appeal Tribunal's ruling in the case of a waiter's appeal against his employer for not distributing the total service charges collected clarifies that employers in service industries must distribute the total amount of service charges. Although employers have discretion in the distribution, the employer's mandatory decision to allocate some of the total service charges to the house, was seen as a violation of the employment contract.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1995
Compensation and benefits, Waiters, Waitpersons

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United Kingdom, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Remedies for unlawful discrimination. Questions on part-timers' pension rights referred to ECJ. No discrimination against part-timers in over-time rules
  • Abstracts: Constructing a new paradigm of labor arbitration. National Labor Relations Board: deferral to arbitration. Starting from scratch: ADR helps resolve labor conflicts in the new Hungary
  • Abstracts: Ethical issues confronting labor arbitrators; is a recent court definition of fraud too broad? The NAA: looking for a few good arbitrators
  • Abstracts: The European Union has become antitrust player; investigations of mergers and other global deals costs U.S. companies money and time - and are proliferating
  • Abstracts: TUPE requires employee's knowledge of transfer. Fundamental changes in business preclude transfer. Contracting-out and contracting-in covered by TUPE
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.