Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Products liability exposure: the sacrifice of American innovation

Article Abstract:

The increase in product liability cases and excessive punitive damage awards has damaged American companies' ability to compete in international markets because of the risks involved in the introduction of new products. The focus on research and development has been replaced by attempts to protect companies from product liability suits because the judicial system penalizes manufacturers regardless of the extent of fault. Present product liability law encourages risky behavior by making the manufacturers, not the consumers, liable and undermines the manufacturers' economic stability.

Author: Maloo, Man C., Neil, Benjamin A.
Publisher: Elsevier Science Publishers
Publication Name: Journal of Products Liability
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0363-0404
Year: 1991
Economic aspects, Industrial research, International competition (Commerce), International competition (Economics)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Multiple imposition of punitive damages

Article Abstract:

Due process guarantees may prevent the assessment of several punitive damage awards against a products liability defendant for a single tort. State reform ideas have included placing limits on punitive damage awards, eliminating punitive damages altogether, or giving judges ultimate discretion in determining damages. A national solution is necessary, however, to achieve uniform punitive damages standards that are fundamentally fair and punish in proportion to a defendant's wrongdoing.

Author: DiTata, Barbara
Publisher: Elsevier Science Publishers
Publication Name: Journal of Products Liability
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0363-0404
Year: 1992
Analysis, Exemplary damages, Punitive damages, Due process of law, Limitation of damages, Limitations of damages

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Moorman doctrine and insurance broker liability law: does Bulk Services represent two worlds in collision?

Article Abstract:

The Illinois Appellate Court's decision in Bulk Services Corp v Buick mistakenly applies the Moorman doctrine's principles of product-liability damages to agent-principle law. The Moorman doctrine holds that plaintiffs in tort actions are not entitled to economic damages. The court's application of this doctrine in Bulk will create confusion in insurance broker liability cases, which are limited to economic damages.

Author: Beckey, Sylvia L.
Publisher: Elsevier Science Publishers
Publication Name: Journal of Products Liability
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0363-0404
Year: 1991
Malpractice, Insurance brokers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Remedies, Product liability, Products liability, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities. Challenging claims! Patenting computer programs in Europe and the USA
  • Abstracts: Reconciling diverse authorities on sales of remainder interests. The Uniform Disclaimer of Property Interests Act: opportunities and pitfalls
  • Abstracts: Strict liability of individuals under CERCLA: a normative analysis. Putting the remedial cart before the statutory horse: the Ninth Circuit reopens debate on CERCLA's definition of disposal
  • Abstracts: The procedural decisions at the threshold of dispute resolution. The FAA on a collision course with the unconscionability doctrine
  • Abstracts: Excess Benefit Plans, Part II. The Nature of the Promise to Pay in a Section 457 Plan
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.