Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Prominence counts in pro bono appearances

Article Abstract:

Marc Galanter and Thomas Palay's idea to improve legal services to the poor by letting law firms meet mandatory pro bono duties by paying other law firms to represent the poor has much to recommend it, but an additional step is needed. The courtrooms where the poor seek justice are disproportionately occupied by the powerless, and prominent attorneys willing to represent the poor can have a positive influence on the dignity of courtroom atmosphere and the upholding of the rights of the poor. Prominent attorneys can protect the legal rights of the poor more effectively than anyone else.

Author: Lubet, Steven
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Criticism and interpretation, Pro bono legal services, Galanter, Marc, Palay, Thomas

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Recusal can deny cert

Article Abstract:

Recusal of a Supreme Court justice from a case can cause the court to deny certiorari even to the party supposedly protected by the recusal. Three remedies are evident: amendment of the judicial code to let a plaintiff waive the recusal for certiorari purposes only, retention of retired Supreme Court justices to fill in when a sitting Justice is recused, or allowing certiorari to be granted with three affirmative votes rather than four when one or more justices are disqualified.

Author: Lubet, Steven
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Laws, regulations and rules, Practice, United States. Supreme Court, Disqualification of judges, Judicial disqualification, Certiorari

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The presidential campaign is off to a dirty start

Article Abstract:

Republicans should not criticize Pres Bill Clinton's judicial selections but should remember that Republican presidents have made mistakes selecting judges too. Better yet, all should remember that even the best judges make mistakes and that it is unfair to blame each ruling on the president who appointed the judge. The judiciary should not be politicized.

Author: Lubet, Steven
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Political activity, Political aspects, Presidential candidates, Political campaigns, Judicial selection

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Prosecutors go to boot camp. Lawyers brace for aftermath. U.S. misconduct may upset cases; FBI probes special treatment of witnesses
  • Abstracts: Pros and cons of a balanced amendment. A new economic paradigm. The '98 economy: as good as '97?
  • Abstracts: Circuits in disarray on six key issues. Federal practice; ABA trial standards. Criminal law; imposing sanctions
  • Abstracts: Decision on personnel at Pitt prompt staff and student protest. Hastings student is suspended for harassment, test violations
  • Abstracts: Land tenure and agricultural productivity on Indian reservations. Contract choice in modern agriculture: cash rent versus cropshare
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.