Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Property rules versus liability rules: an economic analysis

Article Abstract:

Liability rules are preferable to address harmful externalities, with certain exceptions, but property rules appear to offer stronger protection against takings of things. The liability rule is particularly strong in the externality context when there is no opportunity to bargain, but property rules may be needed in limited cases when liability will be ineffectual. Property rules are needed in the takings context because such rules are the most basic way to protect ownership.

Author: Kaplow, Louis, Shavell, Steven
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1996
Laws, regulations and rules, Real estate, Externalities (Economics), Real property, Right of property, Property rights, Eminent domain (Law), Liability (Law), Legal liability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Punitive damages: an economic analysis

Article Abstract:

The deterrent and punitive goals of punitive damage awards are not accomplished under the traditional system where awards are assessed on the basis of defendants' economic ability to pay and culpability. Deterrence can better be accomplished by a system which awards punitive damages only where defendants are very likely to otherwise escape liability. The punishment function is effective only when placed upon individuals and corporate employees.

Author: Shavell, Steven, Polinsky, A. Mitchell
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
Exemplary damages, Punitive damages

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Fairness versus welfare

Article Abstract:

The authors argue that policy assessment should focus exclusively on effects on individual welfare, even though policy makers and the public believe fairness should be factored in. Arguments for excluding fairness are presented in the areas of tort, contract, procedure, and law enforcement.

Author: Kaplow, Louis, Shavell, Steven
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2001
United States, Social aspects, Welfare, Public assistance, Policy sciences, Fairness

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Analysis, Economic aspects, Law and economics, Law and economics (Jurisprudence)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: ECJ rules on tax deductibility of fees for foreign private schools. AG concludes German rule restricting depreciation of holdings in subsidiaries violates EC law
  • Abstracts: Computer Graphics University. Classic Mac programs
  • Abstracts: Current issues in private placements: private/public offerings. Current issues in private placements: private public offerings
  • Abstracts: "Prospecting for cases": personal trading by portfolio managers, redux. SEC suspensions and bars: "on a clear day, you can see forever."
  • Abstracts: Politics, not law, is behind Jones settlement; experts say recent Supreme Court rulings do little to bolster her appeal
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.