Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Punitive damages in arbitration: Mastrobuono and the need for creation of a national court of commercial appeals

Article Abstract:

The 1995 Mastrobuono decision underscores the limits of the commercial arbitration process, the multitude of conflicts of law in areas such as punitive damage, and the growing need for a national commercial court of appeals to remedy the situation. Such a court could provide consistent national law in commercial litigation, serving as a secondary appellate level separate from the Court of Appeals and the US Supreme Court. The Mastrobuono decision followed five years of national law conflict on the recoverability of punitive damage awards in arbitration cases.

Author: Williams, Victor
Publisher: Commercial Law League of America
Publication Name: Commercial Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-3055
Year: 1995
Innovations, Securities industry, Conflict of laws, Commercial arbitration agreements

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


In whose interests? Evaluating attorneys' fee awards and contingent-fee agreements in social security disability benefits cases

Article Abstract:

The techniques used to determine the fees of attorneys representing people owed back-benefits for social security disability claims need to be revised, as attorneys are getting more than their share of the benefits desperately needed by their clients. The approaches used by courts in determining such fees are discussed, as are the use of contingency fees and possible alternatives fee arrangements.

Author: Williams, Victor, MacDonald, Alison M.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1995
Analysis, Attorneys, Lawyers' fees, Disability insurance, Contingency fees, Social security beneficiaries

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Punitive damages awards in commercial arbitrations: the role of federal substantive law in deriving contractual intent

Article Abstract:

Punitive damages should be specifically excluded from arbitration clauses if this is the intention of the parties. Alternatively, the parties should expect that punitive damages will be an issue at a pre-agreed to arbitration. The Federal Arbitration Act generally governs these types of agreements, assuming that there is a written provision to settle disputes through arbitration.

Author: Silverman, Stuart I.
Publisher: Commercial Law League of America
Publication Name: Commercial Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-3055
Year: 1997
Building, Developing, and General Contracting, Contract Construction, Construction industry, Remedies, Negotiation, mediation and arbitration, Contracts, Construction contracts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Exemplary damages, Punitive damages, Commercial arbitration
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Alternatives to arbitration: are unions ready for change? Does our arbitration have a place in the world of ADR?
  • Abstracts: Is it time to give the S corporation a proper burial? The partnership allocation rules of section 704(b): to be or not to be
  • Abstracts: Because securitized mortgages involve public or private offerings of securities, they require a broader range of legal expertise than conventional mortgages
  • Abstracts: Still worthy of praise. Flawed foundations: the philosophical critique of (a particular type of) economics
  • Abstracts: Neither ERISA's anti-alienation provisions not QDRO rules apply to welfare benefit plans. Proceeds of a settlement from an ERISA lawsuit are taxable
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.