Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Putting the plaintiff and defendant on even ground: defining standards of settlement review and the statute of limitations in shareholder actions

Article Abstract:

The Delaware Chancery Court is applying the notion of fairness in shareholder actions differently when evaluating settlements and determining the applicability of the statute of limitations. Settlements where many involved shareholders were not part of the negotiations have been subject to strict fairness evaluations. However, the Court has not enforced the statute of limitations even when plaintiffs knew of self-dealing but did not press the suit until the self-dealing became obvious to everyone, with the statute coming into effect upon initial discovery.

Author: Miello, Dawn A.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 1996
Stockholder Suits, Case Note, Limitation of actions, Statute of limitations, Delaware

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Defeating poison pills though enactment of a state shareholder protection statute

Article Abstract:

The author suggests that it might be possible for a state to enact a shareholder protection statute capable of disabling all poison pills, i.e. shareholder rights agreements, irrespective of the target corporation's state of incorporation. An overview of shareholder rights agreements is included.

Author: Braendel, Addison D.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 2000
States, Corporate anti-takeover measures, Antitakeover strategies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


May a shareholder who objects to a proposed settlement of a derivative action appeal an adverse decision? A report on California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Felzen

Article Abstract:

The effect of California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Felzen on the ability of a shareholder objecting to the proposed settlement of a derivative action to file an appeal is discussed. The Central District of Illinois issued the ruling in 1996.

Author: Falk, Roslyn
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 2000

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Compromise and settlement, Cases, Settlements (Law), Stockholders' derivative actions, Shareholder lawsuits, United States, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: When litigating over computer systems, plaintiffs and defendants both need to be aware of preconceived notions jurors have about software performance
  • Abstracts: Fear of filing: securities fraud plaintiffs steering clear of federal restrictions by suing in state court, study says
  • Abstracts: First steps in the law: a look at how four young attorneys spend their first year after graduation. Commercial leases may trap law office tenants; lawyers seeking new space should hire commercial leasing attorneys to help avoid pitfalls
  • Abstracts: Interested director transactions and the (equivocal) effects of shareholder ratification. Nonprofit corporations: conversion to for-profit corporate status and nonprofit corporation members' rights
  • Abstracts: How real is the risk of a massive banking collapse? The motivations behind banking reform. A new era of banking
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.