Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Questioning competence: mentally incapacitated clients still can tell their lawyers what to do

Article Abstract:

Attorneys with mentally incapacitated clients still have the general obligation under Rule 1.2 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct to do what the client wants. This rule is augmented by Model Rule 1.14 on representing clients with disabilities, stating that lawyers with such clients should maintain a normal attorney-client relationship as much as possible. Determining clients' abilities to make decisions regarding the case is more important than determining their general mental capacity.

Author: Garwin, Arthur
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Legal services, Attorneys, Offices of Lawyers, Evaluation, Lawyers, Capacity and disability, Practice of law, Attorney and client

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Take my client, please; ethical guidelines for lawyer referral fees

Article Abstract:

ABA Model Rule 1.5(e)(1) is a guideline for attorney referral fees, stating that each attorney must have a written client agreement concerning the joint responsibility for legal services and that fee division must take place in proportion to the services each lawyer performs. The ethical obligations in joint responsibility are the same as those born by a partner or supervising attorney. Some jurisdictions do not permit a referring attorney to collect a fee because of conflict of interest concerns.

Author: Garwin, Arthur
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Economic aspects, Attorneys, Lawyers' fees, Attorney referral service, Lawyer referral service

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


You can't take it with you; when can you restrict a former partner from practicing law?

Article Abstract:

Model Rule 5.6(a) forbids non-competition agreements for law firm partners except as a condition for the receipt of pension benefits. The rationale of the rule is to encourage attorneys' professional independence but, in spite of this rule, these agreements do exist. Cases on the subject focus on the type of monies withheld and the interest in law partnership survival.

Author: Garwin, Arthur
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Interpretation and construction, Non-competition agreements, Noncompete agreements

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Standards, Legal ethics
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Picture of competency; illustrated tests assess child's ability to tell the truth in testimony. Image is everything; court slams child porn law as covering digital works and art, too
  • Abstracts: Cost-cutting consequences; an HMO liability case is being closely watched by the lawyers who targeted tobacco companies
  • Abstracts: Patentability of computer related inventions in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Written description guidelines and utility guidelines
  • Abstracts: Those mainframes simply don't compute any more. Technology options; law departments stay ahead of law firms. Firms invest in technology to keep an eye on the future
  • Abstracts: Those thinking of a legal career guiltily point to others' greed. ABA report says academia, bar need to bolster lawyering skills
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.