Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

'Reasonable woman' test catches on

Article Abstract:

The 9th US Circuit Court used the case of Ellison v Brady to set a 'reasonable woman' standard for hostile work environment sexual harassment claims. This approach has become very popular in other federal courts, and even state courts have followed it. In Andrews v City of Philadelphia, the 3rd Circuit took a compromise position, stating that the plaintiff must show that the discrimination which occurred would adversely affect 'a reasonable person of the same sex in that position.'

Author: Wallach, Eric J., Jacobson, Alyse L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Burden of proof

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


After 'O'Connor v. Coin Caterers,' the question remains: When does replacing an employee with a younger employee become actionable age discrimination?

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court ruled in O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp. that a terminated employee had a prima facie age discrimination case when the replacement employee was substantially younger and that such an employee did not need to be younger than 40. The spirit of the case indicated that age differences of less than 3-10 years were not worthy of much consideration. After O'Connor, more age discrimination suits will probably be dismissed at the pretrial stage.

Author: Wallach, Eric J., Reider, Leslie
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
United States, Age discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


'Reasonable woman' test may perpetuate sex bias

Article Abstract:

The 'reasonable woman' standard for judging hostile environment sexual harassment cases subverts the purpose of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by perpetuating sexual stereotypes. It should be replaced by a 'gender-neutral' 'reasonable person' standard. Moreover, neither all women nor all men think alike, so each sexual harassment claim must be evaluated individually. Reinforcing stereotypes harms women.

Author: Saady, Claire
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Analysis, Reasonable man doctrine, Reasonable person standard

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Sexual harassment, Employment discrimination
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: At United Way, she remains the one. Going to the mall is part of his job
  • Abstracts: A constitutional siesta; court focuses on statutory interpretation and common law. Snapshot of progress; women steadily gaining ground in association leadership, commission report reveals
  • Abstracts: AIDS phobia; reasonable fears or unreasonable lawsuits? Having my baby; unwed fathers score victory in California
  • Abstracts: IRS issues major secular trust rulings on employer grantor trust arrangements. IRS issues more secular trust rulings
  • Abstracts: Tax apportionment clauses that carry out a client's intent. Deferred comp. package affected by estate plans. Deferring estate tax is not always a beneficial move
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.