Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Recovery of unconstitutional taxes: a new approach

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court has recently decided several cases on the retroactivity of decisions involving state and local taxation, but has not articulated a clear standard for determining retroactivity. In general, decisions involving new law are not retroactive. In James B. Beam Distilling Co v. Georgia, the option of selective prospectivity was abandoned. In McKesson Corp v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, the state was required to provide retroactive relief for unlawful taxes paid under duress. Several state courts have reached opposite conclusions concerning the retroactivity of Davis v. Michigan.

Author: Shores, David F.
Publisher: Virginia Tax Review
Publication Name: Virginia Tax Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0735-9004
Year: 1992
Analysis, Cases, State taxation, Tax refunds, Retroactive judicial decisions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Section 304 and the limits of statutory law

Article Abstract:

IRC section 304 is needed to preserve the dividend rules when stock distributions do not reduce the proportionate interests of the distributees, but the history of section 304 also demonstrates problems with the way tax laws are interpreted and revised. Courts' treatment of tax provisions related to section 304 in Mead Corp. v. Commissioner and Wanamaker Trust v. Commissioner show that acting in conflict with Congress will not yield good tax law. The courts and Congress have been far more effective when they have worked together to develop laws governing the taxation of stock redemptions.

Author: Shores, David F.
Publisher: Virginia Tax Review
Publication Name: Virginia Tax Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0735-9004
Year: 1997
Taxation, Affiliated corporations, Dividends, Recognition of gain or loss (Taxation), Recognized gain or loss (Taxation), Stock redemption

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Reexamining continuity of shareholder interest in corporate reorganizations

Article Abstract:

IRS regulations have limited the availability of meeting the continuity of shareholder interest rule for the purpose of receiving tax-free treatment of corporate reorganizations. The regulations support the underlying purposes of relevant IRC provisions and Supreme Court precedent. The regulations which apply to acquisitive reorganizations do not specify whether they will apply to the fundamentally differing transactions of divisive reorganizations.

Author: Shores, David F.
Publisher: Virginia Tax Review
Publication Name: Virginia Tax Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0735-9004
Year: 1998
Mergers & Acquisitions, Acquisitions and mergers, Stockholders, Interest (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, United States, Tax law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The unjust enrichment doctrine: an expanded definition threatens the rights of secured lenders
  • Abstracts: Practical concerns affecting the arbitration of statutory claims. Labor-management dispute resolution and the media
  • Abstracts: The "powers of appreciation": who is the ultimate guardian of UN legality? The emerging right to democratic governance
  • Abstracts: People of influence; push is on in Congress to revamp lobbying disclosure laws. In the looking glass; Congress launches intense self-examination effort
  • Abstracts: Trade spike spurs tax treaty talks; multinationals press Clinton administration to end double taxation. SEC nominee says he'll study curbs on securities suits
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.