Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Regulatory reform in transition: the telecommunications industry and MFJ regulation

Article Abstract:

Legislation ending the Modified Final Judgment (MFJ) restrictions, which prevent the Baby Bells from entering various telecommunications markets, will change the industry but could revive pre-divestiture alliances and market barriers. Baby Bells, feeling pressure from local competition, are seeking to be released from MFJ restrictions and create a totally competitive marketplace. AT&T's divestiture resulted in rate reductions and increased services offerings, but market pressures on AT&T, Sprint, and MCI have also lessened, so freeing the Baby Bells might increase long-distance competition.

Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1995
Deregulation, Regional Bell Operating Companies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The shape of competition under Title VII of the Energy Policy Act of 1992

Article Abstract:

The 1992 Energy Policy Act's Title VII provision increased electric industry competition by creating a class of Exempt Wholesale Generators (EWGs). This legislation, combined with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's authority over wholesale wheeling, the electricity transmissions to wholesale customers, is reshaping the industry into a system of efficient generators and transmission-distribution specialists. Non-utility EWGs, transmission-dependent utilities, and increased wholesale market competition will lead to better prices by changing the industry's vertical structure.

Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1995
Electric utilities, Practice, Market share, United States. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Technology and competition come to telecommunications: re-examining exemptions to the Federal Trade Commission Act

Article Abstract:

The FCC is not prepared for new technologies and competition in the communications industry and will not likely adequately protect consumers and competitive businesses in the electronic marketplace of the future. A major problem is the FCC's exclusive jurisdiction over the regulation of common carriers even if other businesses involved in transactions are not common carriers as is true in the electronic marketplace. Better consumer protections would be provided by subsuming communications regulation under the more prepared and experienced FTC.

Author: Cooper, Scott
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1997
Powers and duties, United States. Federal Trade Commission

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Telecommunications services industry, Telecommunications industry, Competition (Economics)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Clearing the track: the remaining transportation regulations. Regulating the regulators: regulatory process reform in the 104th Congress
  • Abstracts: Relaxing the regulatory stranglehold on communications. The Bay Bridge blunder
  • Abstracts: Mandating individual retirement savings. Educating the public about personal finance: a call for action. Social Security reform
  • Abstracts: Competition in international telecommunications services. Will universal service and common carriage survive the Telecommunications Act of 1996?
  • Abstracts: 'Cheap stock' options draw SEC review: at issue: the valuation given and its effect on earnings. More courts find de facto 'franchises;' unexpected status triggers new obligations, liabilities
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.