Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Rehabilitation; different ways to climb out of a hole

Article Abstract:

Attorneys who focus on rehabilitating a case rather than a witness will have a broader range of options. Re-direct examination is the most immediate answer to damaging cross-examination, but it must be structured so as to point out efficiently what was not addressed during cross rather than belabor what was. Bringing in other witnesses to corroborate the client's testimony may help, as may introducing the complete version of statements taken out of context, rebuttal and judicial notice.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Helping the witness; techniques for keeping witnesses out of trouble

Article Abstract:

It is essential that witness preparation take place before trial. Attorneys should know the witness' limitations, advise them not to guess or bluff, ask simple questions and tell the witnesses to speak up if they do not understand while at the same time watching for visual cues that the witness is having trouble, and advise the witness about how to dress. Practice direct and cross-examinations should also take place before trial.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Evasive witnesses: using cross-examination to tell your side of the case

Article Abstract:

The cross-examination is not for gathering information but rather for the attorneys to tell how they perceive the case based on their information. Reluctant witnesses can be controlled through prompting and using information from sworn testimony or other evidence. Even when a witness is consistently evasive, an attorney can gain jury support by showing who has the more complete information.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Legal services, Attorneys, Offices of Lawyers, Psychological aspects, United States, Lawyers, Witnesses, Cross-examination, Cross examination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Methods, Trial practice, Examination of witnesses, Witness examination
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Same ills, different solutions; tale of two cities. Seeking clarity on fines for polluting agencies
  • Abstracts: Kirkland & Ellis partners depart; to form new boutique. 'Invasion' of Chicago stops cold; in the end, just a few outside firms dared to enter
  • Abstracts: The FDIC, taking a different approach from the Federal Reserve, weighs in on how regulations of deposits apply to stored value cards
  • Abstracts: Merger in the District of Columbia dodges the funding-cut bullet. D.C. government budget deficit threatens publicly funded school
  • Abstracts: Disclaimer of father's estate by son was upheld by CA-10. Time for filing disclaimer begins on date of death, concludes CA-7
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.