Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Rights of passage; three rulings uphold restrictions on public ways

Article Abstract:

Several court decisions of the mid-1990s show a willingness to let municipalities address social problems or situations which can turn into problems. In Brandmiller v. Arreola, the Wisconsin Supreme Court granted summary judgment for municipalities challenging juvenile cruising while acknowledging that the right to travel is part of our constititutional idea of personal liberty. The United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled on the application of the commercial speech doctrine to the use of barkers to hand out advertising for restaurants on public thoroughfares in Sciarrino v. City of Key West.

Author: Podgers, James
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Juvenile delinquency, Loitering, Automobile driving in cities, City driving, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


House adopts trial standards; guidelines aim to address issues raised by innovative court techniques

Article Abstract:

The ABA House of Delegates has adopted the Civil Practice Trial Standards, which are guidelines for certain practical issues arising in trial. The standards were developed by the Litigation Section's Task Force on Civil Trial Practice Standards. Litigation Section Chair Gregory P. Joseph calls them an evolution of existing rules, and one of the standards, for example, does not advocate televising trials, but sets forth factors for a judge in a jurisdiction which permits such televising to consider in ruling on whether to permit cameras.

Author: Podgers, James
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Standards, Trial practice

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Bad news: newspapers fight restrictions on some old-fashioned distribution techniques

Article Abstract:

Community ordinances regulating commercial speech continue to receive judicial attention, with many decisions going against newsvendors and newsrack owners. The 1993 Supreme Court ruling in Cincinnati v Discovery Network struck down a content-specific ordinance, but several courts have upheld those that are content-neutral and within towns' traditional purview, such as controlling esthetics, safety, and traffic flow. With a variety of new cases in progress, judicial opinion will doubtless continue to evolve.

Author: Podgers, James
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Cases, Freedom of speech, Newspaper vending machines, Newsstands

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Ordinances, Municipal, Municipal ordinances
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: No smoking! The arbitration of smoking restricting policies. Arbitration of employee refusal to work overtime
  • Abstracts: Unfair dismissal. No qualifying period for transfer dismissal claim
  • Abstracts: Stress and common sense: the first ever HSE guidance on tackling stress at work. University health and safety: new approaches to management
  • Abstracts: A matter of full faith: legislators scramble to bar recognition of gay marriages. Judge gets tough in fungicide trials
  • Abstracts: 'Split decision' pending in Congress: Judiciary Committee Oks bill to divide 9th Circuit, despite judges' opposition
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.