Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

SEC defines 'securities' expansively; agency wants U.S. laws to protect Lloyd'd investors

Article Abstract:

Lloyd's of London terms itself an English insurance market not controlled by US securities law in defense against securities fraud actions by American 'names', but an amicus brief by the SEC held that the 'names' did not waive their US securities law remedies when entering into the contract with Lloyd's. The amicus brief noted that the choice of forum provisions favored by Lloyd's would allow foreign securities promoters to avoid private liability.

Author: Donovan, Karen
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Insurance Agencies and Brokerages, Insurance agents, brokers, & service, Insurance Agents & Brokers, Cases, Insurance industry, Lloyd's of London, United States. Securities and Exchange Commission

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Securities defense finds a safe harbor

Article Abstract:

The House has passed a bill that would create a safe harbor against lawsuits based on performance projections for publically traded companies. The Securities Litigation Reform Act is aimed at protecting companies from securities fraud suits. The passed version has been criticized from keeping too many potentially fraudulent actions immune from suit and not properly addressing recklessness.

Author: Donovan, Karen
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Laws, regulations and rules, Securities fraud

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


GOP threatens securities suits: House bill would kill 'fraud on the market' theory behind class actions

Article Abstract:

The Republican Contract with America promises to eliminate securities class action suits that are frivolous. However, the actual changes, such as increased burden of proof and level of intent requirements, would prevent any class action suits while some provisions would harm securities firms by making it difficult to obtain liability insurance.

Author: Donovan, Karen
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Investment advice, Investment Advisory Services, Political activity, Prevention, Investment advisers, Republican Party (United States), Frivolous suits (Civil procedure)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Securities law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Securities; day trading. Securities law; the SEC's IPO probe. Securities law; stock for legal work
  • Abstracts: How the proxy rules discourage constructive engagement: regulatory barriers to electing a minority of directors
  • Abstracts: Securities malpractice exposure: client representation - certain problematic solutions. The SEC and prime bank securities frauds: past, present and future
  • Abstracts: The EPA and some state legislatures weigh strengthening the self-critical analysis privilege so as to promote candor in audits
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.