Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

SEC staff refuses no-action letter permitting issuer to exclude compensation-related shareholder proposal

Article Abstract:

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) refused to grant Philip Morris the no-action letter requested so that it could exclude a specific shareholder proposal from its proxy statement. The SEC is currently unwilling to issue no-action letters on executive compensation issues. The shareholder proposal requests that a report be prepared on the extent to which social and environmental concerns are being integrated into executive compensation determinations. Philip Morris argued that the shareholders were using the compensation issue to ensure that the SEC would not issue a no-action letter.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1996
Philip Morris Inc., Voting rights (Stockholders)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


SEC staff refuses to allow omission of shareholder proposal on executive pay

Article Abstract:

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) denied a request by Goldfield Corp that it be allowed to omit a shareholder executive compensation proposal from the proxy statement for its annual meeting. Goldfield requested that the omission be allowed because adoption the proposal would breach existing agreements and violate state law. Under SEC rules, proposals that would break the law can be omitted. The SEC did not agree with Goldfield's interpretation and suggested that the company include the proposal and revise the proposal immediately afterward.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1995
Goldfield Corp., GV

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


IRS rules on outside director issues

Article Abstract:

Two letter rulings issued by the IRS clarify outside director qualifications for the IRC section 162(m) ceiling on deductions for highly paid employees' compensation. Letter ruling 9731006 states outside directors cannot receive more than de minimis remuneration or remuneration for personal services exceeding $60,000 from a publicly held company. Letter ruling 9732011 defines officers as administrative executives with official authority whose service is or was regular and continuous.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1997
Corporate directors, Wages, Wages and salaries

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Management, Laws, regulations and rules, Compensation and benefits, Executives, Executive compensation, Proxy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Selected issues respecting stock based compensation schemes. MD & A, forward-looking statements and related disclosure issues
  • Abstracts: Decisional model for predicting outcomes of arbitrated sexual harassment disputes. Arbitration of sexual harassment disputes: case characteristics and case outcomes in public versus private sector cases
  • Abstracts: Wireless worries: experts raise concerns about city-run wireless Internet services. 9th circuit elevates the Internet
  • Abstracts: Back to BASIC - stages of international tax planning or: getting the grip on a rocky road
  • Abstracts: Companies plan for near-term offerings; many private businesses now operate with an eye to ultimate initial public offerings or sales
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.