Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Section 404(a)(7) limits applied separately to employers in controlled group

Article Abstract:

The IRS ruled in PLR 9626046 that the IRC section 404(a) limits placed on contributions made to a controlled group's benefit plans do not need to be calculated by including employees of controlled group members not participating in the benefit plans. Section 404(a) places annual limits on deductions for contributions to benefit plans. Members of a controlled group participating collectively in benefit plans are treated as one employer for purposes of section 404(a) testing, but contributions to individuals employed by non-participating group members are not factored in.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1996
Compensation and benefits, Affiliated corporations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Patterson v. Shumate: a five-year legacy

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court established in Patterson v. Shumate that certain retirement plan funds are excluded from the debtor's bankruptcy estate, but courts interpreting that 1992 decision have had difficulty determining which plans qualify and when. Unlike exempted property, excluded property is never part of the bankruptcy estate, making the applicability of Patterson valuable. The Court's decision focused on interpreting section 541(c)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code and did not adequately address its interaction with the Internal Revenue Code and ERISA.

Author: Falk, Charles Edward
Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1997
Interpretation and construction, Bankruptcy law, Bankruptcy estates, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


DOL finds voluntary severance program is an ERISA pension plan

Article Abstract:

A university voluntary employee severance plan was found by the US Labor Dept. (DOL) to be an ERISA pension plan which must comply with ERISA disclosure, fiduciary, and procedural rules. The DOL in Advisory Opinion 99-01A would not treat the plan as a welfare benefit plan because of several factors including its not falling within relevant DOL safe harbor regulation requirements.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1999
United States, Severance pay

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Pension funds, Qualified benefit plans
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Election and statement requirements proliferate. Special issues for consolidated groups converting to S corporation status
  • Abstracts: How corporations handle Rule 4.2. It pays to be alert about unforeseen conflicts. It's tough to represent business and stay pure
  • Abstracts: Discount available when property was held partly outright and partly in QTIP trust. Securities law restrictions that lapsed at death were ignored in valuing stock
  • Abstracts: Jr. Partner adds calendaring from court rules. Calendar using court rules. Conquering taxing calculations
  • Abstracts: Technology budgeting is difficult; prices fall, but hidden costs rise. Computers don't always do just what you want; lawyers find technology no panacea. Alas, some are working even harder
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.