Separability and the US Supreme Court decision in Buckeye v. Cardegna

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court on February 21, 2006 in the Buckeye Check Cashing Inc. v. Cardegna case concluded that the Florida Supreme Court infringed the Federal Arbitration Act when it refused to enforce an arbitral clause contained in a contract that was alleged to be void for breach of the Florida usury laws. The real value in the Court' decision is the reasonably clear statement of three different aspects of separability, and the causes and reasons for the distinct treatment of arbitration clauses within contracts in the USA and other major arbitration legal systems can be explored from these.

Financial Services, Finance and Insurance, DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS, Company legal issue, Cases, Financial services industry, Case overview, Cardegna, John, Reuter, Donna

---

Limitation period for the enforcement of arbitral awards in Nigeria

Article Abstract:

A brief look at the steps that are imposed by Nigerian statutes for summary enforcement of arbitral wards in courts and the time limit they impose is discussed. Enforcement of arbitral awards is found to be of immense importance in the entire process of arbitration however this aspect seems to be in some confusion from both inconsistent legislation and judicial decisions. It is hoped that as arbitral practice in Nigeria continues to increase, the courts will clear up these inconsistencies through some legislative reform.

Nigeria, Law overview

---

Using section 1782 in international arbitration

Article Abstract:

The article discusses a United States statute, 28 under section 1782 that deals with evidence regarding arbitration proceedings. Various statements on whether the use of section 1782 in international arbitration is a boon or a bad development for the field or arbitration are given.

Analysis, Arbitration (Administrative law), Administrative arbitration, International mediation, Statutes

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: The waiting at the (patent) bar is over - the Supreme Court decides Hilton Davis. Do the means justify the end - a matter of Bond, Bowles, the office and 35 U.S.C. s. 112, paragraph 6
• Abstracts: Rocking the boat; the Supreme Court edges toward overturning precedent in two key cases. Arguing religion; searching for clear commandments in this term's religion cases
• Abstracts: Tech on the rise: attorneys are more willing to incorporate technology in legal arena. Perfect match
• Abstracts: Security, Wi-Fi use on the rise. Studies show improvements in e-government
• Abstracts: Bring on the battle: MSN prepares for the search engine wars

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.