Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Should the Supreme Court presume that Congress acts constitutionally? The role of the canon of avoidance and reliance on early legislative practice in constitutional interpretation

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court has traditionally defered to constitutional interpretation by both contemporary and early Congresses. However, the influence of political concerns on Congress may make this deference untenable. Political considerations have motivated both contemporary and early Congresses to a greater extent than sound constitutional interpretive methods.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2003
Product standards, safety, & recalls, Management dynamics, Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Constitutional Procedures, Standards, Political aspects, United States. Congress, Judicial review

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The new constitutional order and the chastening of constitutional aspiration

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the new constitutional order that has developed since 1980 and the end of the New Deal/Great Society paradigm. He examines the Supreme Court's reduced role under the new order, and argues that the federal government's sovereignty has diminished with respect to transnational corporate power and supranational government institutions.

Author: Tushnet, Mark V.
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1999

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Are tax "benefits" constitutionally equivalent to direct expenditures?

Article Abstract:

US Supreme Court jurisprudence concerning the equivalence of direct public expenditures and tax benefits is inconsistent and should be discarded for a case-by-case approach. The Court's attempts to apply generalized principles in this area has been forced and unsuccessful due to the variety of applications possible and their interaction.

Author: Zelinsky, Edward A.
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
Analysis, Laws, regulations and rules, Expenditures, Public, Public expenditures, Tax expenditures

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Interpretation and construction, Practice, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation, United States. Supreme Court, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Products liability - forum non conveniens - California Supreme Court rejects consideration of the favorable law of a foreign plaintiff's chosen forum as an element in forum non conveniens analysis
  • Abstracts: So what is a lawyer, anyway? The fight over non-lawyers and legal services comes to a head. After the deluge; Chicago's once-ridiculed law department gets high marks and high visibility following the disastrous flood
  • Abstracts: Settlements in EC merger control proceedings: a summary of EC enforcement practice and a comparison with the United States
  • Abstracts: Settlements in EC merger control proceedings: a summary of EC enforcement practice and a comparison with the United States. part 2
  • Abstracts: Exclusionary rule reforms advance; opponents claim proposals unconstitutional, encourage police misconduct. The courtship of Byron White
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.