Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Some newer cost-containment ideas

Article Abstract:

Costs can be contained in traditional indemnity health insurance plans by requiring prenatal care, preapproving visits to specialists and limiting mental health and substance abuse coverage. Employers should analyze their health claims for the frequency of these types of claims before using these techniques. Frequent mental health and substance abuse benefits claims can be coordinated by a managed-care plan while preapproval is only necessary when employees bypass primary care in favor of specialists or the emergency room. Required prenatal care is only useful with a young, female workforce.

Author: Beam, Burton T., Jr., Tacchino, Kenn B.
Publisher: American Society of CLU
Publication Name: Journal of the American Society of CLU & ChFC
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1052-2875
Year: 1993
Management, Health insurance, Medical care, Cost of, Health care costs

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Looking beyond changes for opportunities

Article Abstract:

The extensive pension law changes for employee benefit plans through legislation and litigation concern many benefit planners. However, each change can be considered a new opportunity if addressed in the right manner. Examples of opportunities created include the Patterson v. Shumate case which protects pension plans from creditors in bankruptcy and the law allowing rollover into individual retirement accounts if the plan includes distributions. Other changes have also created opportunities for the employee benefit planner.

Author: Beam, Burton T., Jr., Tacchino, Kenn B.
Publisher: American Society of CLU
Publication Name: Journal of the American Society of CLU & ChFC
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1052-2875
Year: 1993
Interpretation and construction, Bankruptcy law, Qualified benefit plans, Rollovers (Finance)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Whose pension is it anyway?

Article Abstract:

The Retirement Equity Act of 1984 established the rights of spouses to the husband's or wife's pension benefits in case of divorce. The law permits a plan trustee to distribute the assets of the pension trust under a court order that amounts to a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO). State law dictates the way in which the trust is distributed. A cash settlement is one option, while a QDRO defers payments until the plan comes to fruition. QDROs do not apply to individual IRAs.

Author: Beam, Burton T., Jr., Tacchino, Kenn B.
Publisher: American Society of CLU
Publication Name: Journal of the American Society of CLU & ChFC
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1052-2875
Year: 1993
Analysis, Defined benefit plans, Separation (Law), Marital separation, Equitable distribution of marital property, Divorce property distribution

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Planning, Employee benefits, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Same ills, different solutions; tale of two cities. Seeking clarity on fines for polluting agencies
  • Abstracts: Concert of action theory loses ground. Justices may end confusion on punitives. Jurisdiction ruling charts new course
  • Abstracts: Continued prosecution in a continuation application, or a Transco best mode trap for the unwary? Comment: stripping politics from the Board
  • Abstracts: Recent developments relating to Section 482 and tax treaties. Tax Court rejects IRS sourcing rule for royalty income
  • Abstracts: Dean comes out swinging and defends accreditation ABA-style. Former dean of St. John's sues ABA over accreditation fracas
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.