Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

'Sprague' is ERISA appeal to watch

Article Abstract:

Sprague v. General Motors, a United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruling, would, if upheld, allow corporations to charge retirees for medical benefits even though they have promised that such benefits would be free for life. The decision has not only been upheld by the 6th Circuit en banc but cited favorably by the 7th Circuit. Plaintiffs attorneys say the ruling would permit corporations to renege on such promises as long as fine print in the formal documents gives them the right to cancel benefits.

Author: Van Duch, Darryl
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Health insurance, Retirement benefits

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Courts peel HMO shield in medical malpractice cases: federal appeals courts rulings punch holes in ERISA protection. Will employers' self-insured plans be next?

Article Abstract:

Rulings by the 3d and 10th US Circuit Courts of Appeals may limit the once- broad interpretation of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) as applied to employer-provided medical coverage. Most federal trial courts have held that ERISA pre-empts state malpractice claims, which defense lawyers say keeps HMO premiums low. The 3d Circuit's reversal of a lower court's once well-regarded ruling in Dukes v. US Healthcare Systems throws doubt on the immunity of HMOs and self-funded plans.

Author: Van Duch, Darryl
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Laws, regulations and rules, Medical personnel, Malpractice, Health maintenance organizations, Medical malpractice, Exclusive and concurrent legislative powers, Preemption (Legislative power)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Zero-down bankruptcies may end; some courts forbid lawyers from delaying their fees

Article Abstract:

Several courts have found that the zero-down practice, common in bankruptcy actions as a way of paying legal bills, is illegal and that the code of professional responsibility makes it unethical. The bankruptcy code reform bills being drafted in the late 1990s in Congress do not address zero-down fee arrangements in consumer bankruptcies. Some bankruptcy specialists estimate that the zero-down practice was used in as many as half of 1997's 1.2 mil consumer bankruptcies.

Author: Van Duch, Darryl
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Management, Bankruptcy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Suicide cases led by bicoastal duo. A death penalty duel; U.N. court orders U.S. to stay executions. Board battle; Canada and U.S. are in long dispute over imports
  • Abstracts: Reaching out to women of color: special report chronicles concerns over bias in the profession. Riding high on the hog; in biker disguse, these guys roared off to motorcycle mecca
  • Abstracts: A procurement-related rationale is needed to sustain Clinton's executive order prohibiting federal contractors from permanently replacing striking workers
  • Abstracts: Bill building: solo reveals tried-and-true secrets for creating bills clients happily pay
  • Abstracts: Courting trouble: emergence of common-law courts raises concerns among critics
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.