Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Sterilization ordered for child abuser; from Tennessee to Texas, judges order procedure when defendants volunteer

Article Abstract:

Courts sometimes order sterilization as part of a child molestation sentence, but these orders are usually overturned on appeal. The 1942 US Supreme Court case of Skinner v Oklahoma ruled that compulsory sterilization was a civil rights violation. Tennessee prosecutors are claiming that the sentence in Tennessee v Gross requiring sterilization as a condition of probation is legal because the defendant voluntarily agreed to that punishment.

Author: Curriden, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Sentences (Criminal procedure), Sterilization, Eugenic, Involuntary sterilization, Child sexual abuse

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


How Shoob derailed a plea; after judge questions case against bank official, investigations follow

Article Abstract:

Federal judge Marvin Shoob is handling the government case against Christopher Drogoul, former official of the Banca Nazionale del Lavoro accused of handling $5 billion in illegal loans to Iraq. He gives some credence to Drogoul's contention that the CIA knew of the loans and that Drogoul's bank superiors in Rome approved of his actions. He is looking into the existence of a possible coverup.

Author: Curriden, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Investigations, Practice, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, Drogoul, Christopher P., Shoob, Marvin H.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Banning bargaining; Tyler, Texas, judges order a stop to plea agreements

Article Abstract:

Three district judges in Tyler, Texas, have banned the use of plea bargaining in their court. The ban is a response to the judges' feeling that plea bargaining takes sentencing out of their hands, and to the public's uneasiness with the practice. The judges report no increase in trials, but local trial lawyers feel the ban will inevitably lead to more trials.

Author: Curriden, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Plea bargaining, Tyler, Texas

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Mass tort makeover? (impact of lessons learned from class action lawsuits over silicone breast implants on chances for tort reform)
  • Abstracts: Environmental justice without borders: the need for an international court of the environment to protect fundamental environmental rights
  • Abstracts: Has the evolution of the poison pill come to an end? Revlon and deal-protection devices. A fresh look at deal protection devices: out from the shadow of the omnipresent specter
  • Abstracts: Gentile's unanswered questions; drafters struggle to rewrite ethics rules on lawyers' out-of-court statements
  • Abstracts: Visitation, alleged abuse are a potent mix. Pregnant drug abusers sue for treatment. Split rulings for fetal abuse cases
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.