Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Superannuation - protection for investors

Article Abstract:

The additional regulation of investment and protection of investors implemented under the Australian Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 is a significant improvement over other regulation of collective investment. The additional protections are warranted in light of limitations placed on these employer-provided investment vehicles and their compulsory nature. The covenant system for imposing duties on superannuation fund operators should, however, be replaced with laws that impose these duties more directly.

Author: O'Connell, Ann
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1995
Social security, Social security law, Fiduciary duties

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The role of the employment contract in superannuation: an analysis focusing on surplus repatriation powers conferred on employers

Article Abstract:

The doctrine of implied obligation of good faith should not be strictly applied to employment contracts regarding superannuation funds. Instead, repatriation powers of employers should be considered in the broad context of industrial or commercial purpose. This could facilitate distribution of benefit plan or fund surpluses to employers instead of employees or beneficiaries. Legislation and case law is discussed.

Author: Nolan, Anthea
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1996
Analysis, Interpretation and construction, Labor contracts, Good faith (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Maxwell and the accountability of superannuation schemes in Australia: a critical review of law reform

Article Abstract:

The Australian government has proposed inadequate legal reforms for pension funding in the wake of the scandal involving the Maxwell Group. Proposals have come from the Trade Practices Commission, a Senate Select Committee and the Collective Investments Review. These proposals are inconsistent and do not address the depth of the fraud problems which are ongoing for other companies besides the Maxwell Group.

Author: Klumpes, Paul J.M.
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1993
Finance, Fraud, Mirror Group PLC, Robert Maxwell Group Ltd.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Australia, Laws, regulations and rules, Pension funds
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Market power in franchise cases in the wake of Kodak: applying post-contract hold-up analysis to vertical relationships
  • Abstracts: Court settles on narrower view of 4th Amendment: majority limits exclusionary rule, permits school drug testing and adopts a bright line on hearsay
  • Abstracts: Benefits practitioners take warning: contributions of unused vacation pay to employee benefit plans raise complex issues
  • Abstracts: Haiti and the validity of international action. Protecting indigenous rights in international adjudication. The constitutional crisis in the United Nations
  • Abstracts: Tribunal liberates Victorian newsagents and sub-agents. Exercising contractual rights and imposing restrictive conditions - a misuse of market power?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.