Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Superleague: a victory for competition and free markets

Article Abstract:

The Australian Full Federal Court reversed the lower court's decision in News Ltd. v. Australian Rugby Football League (ARFL) and found that the loyalty and commitment agreements imposed by ARFL were anticompetitive. The case involved a new rugby league attempting to compete with ARFL. The trial court found that the relevant market was all professional spectator sports and found the loyalty agreements procompetitive. The Full Federal Court did not directly address the market definition issue, but it did find ARFL's conduct exclusionary and inconsistent with free competition.

Author: Corones, Stephen
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1997
Sports Teams and Clubs, Sports clubs, managers, & promoters, Professional Sports NEC, Barriers to entry (Industrial organization), Barriers to entry, Professional sports, Rugby football clubs, Rugby football teams

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Penalties for price-fixing: a built-in feature of how we do business in Australia?

Article Abstract:

Review of price-fixing cases brought by the Australian Trade Practices Commission suggests that individuals need to be held liable for anticompetitive behavior, either civilly or criminally. The deterrent effect of the penalties under section 76 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 would be increased by imposing penalties on management because penalties imposed on corporations are largely passed on to shareholders. Corporate indemnification of individuals should be restricted and nonpecuniary penalties should be considered.

Author: Corones, Stephen
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1996
Investigations, Remedies, Price fixing, Australia. Trade Practices Commission

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


When is a railway part of a production process? Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v National Competition Council

Article Abstract:

Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v National Competition Council, which found that a railway used for transporting iron ore formed part of a production process and was excluded from the definition of a "service" under Australia's Trade Practices Act, is discussed. The article states that the decision may limit the circumstances in which a person can seek access to "essential facilities."

Author: Corones, Stephen, Hood, Antra
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1999
Australia, Railroad law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Australia, Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Antitrust law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Florida clarifies enforcement of noncompetes. Choice of law in franchise relationships: staying within bounds
  • Abstracts: How to terminate a health insurance agent, maintain your market share of business and avoid litigation. Product warnings: Se habla Espanol? Requirements for foreign language warnings
  • Abstracts: Companies still grapple with safe-harbor issues; corporations should remain wary of making predictions despite Reform Act protection
  • Abstracts: Ombudspersons and the limits of the general counsel's authority under the National Labor Relations Act: an open letter to Fred Feinstein
  • Abstracts: Tax apportionment and the pour-over will. The joys of a taxable CRT. IRS loosens rules on gifts from revocable trusts
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.