Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Plaintiffs' air bag dilemma; auto industry wins child death cases

Article Abstract:

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act as the reason for the increase in securities class action suits is discussed. The act was drafted to decrease frivolous securities fraud suits, but increased corporate accounting fraud could also be leading to increased suits.

Author: Aronson, Peter
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2001
Motor vehicle parts and accessories, All Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing, Auto Restraining Systems, Usage, Automobiles, Product liability, Automobile industry, Air bag restraint systems, Airbag restraint systems, Products liability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Justices' sex harassment decisions spark fears; companies review policies to avoid 'Ellerth' liability

Article Abstract:

Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth and Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, the sexual harassment suits which reached the Supreme Court in 1998, stated that even companies who have a sexual harassment policy in place will be held liable for harassment when an employee has suffered a "tangible employment action" due to sexual harassment by a supervisor. Tangible actions cover such consequences as demotion or dismissal. US companies recognize the need for training and for a clearly written policy forbidding and condemning sexual harassment.

Author: Aronson, Peter
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Analysis, Sexual harassment, Employment discrimination, Workplace multiculturalism, Workplace diversity

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Supreme Court's qui tam case is having an impact; with ruling months off, some lawyers seek to delay old cases, reject new ones

Article Abstract:

The repercussions of the US Supreme Court's pending ruling on the federal whistleblower law in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. US ex rel. Stevens are discussed. Attorneys involved in several other qui tam cases are holding off on settlements while the future of the law is in question.

Author: Aronson, Peter
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Whistle blowing, Whistleblowing, Popular actions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: ERISA; employee benefits law is thorny as ever, and recent changes mean lawyers need to be doubly careful when trekking through the brambles
  • Abstracts: Supreme Court hands windfall to owners of insolvent S corporations. Debt discharge controversy for owners of S corporations
  • Abstracts: Same-sex harassment suits on rise; 8th Circuit Title VII ruling in man-vs.-man case spawns a lower-court following
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.