Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Surrogacy agreements pose biotech quandary for courts; two state courts address novel issues in gestational surrogacy contracts. One looks to adoption law, the other to intent

Article Abstract:

R.R. v. M.H., decided by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, concerned the validity of a surrogacy agreement between a biological father and a biological mother, while In re Marriage of Buzzanca, decided by the California Court of Appeal, concerned the custody of a child conceived with the help of a gestational surrogate. The child was conceived before the parents' divorce, and after the breakup was left without legal parents. For the Buzzanca court intent to parent outweighs status-based biological ties in surrogate parent situations.

Author: Momjian, Mark
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
California, Massachusetts, Parent and child (Law), Surrogate motherhood

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Some things don't belong in contracts

Article Abstract:

The Kass couple contracted while married to donate their frozen embryos produced while trying to have a child to science in the event of a disagreement, and New York's highest court ruled after the couple divorced that simple contract doctrine governed litigation which ensued concerning the ex-wife's desire to have another implantation procedure and the ex-husband's objections. Contract principles are, however, not wise tools for disputes over frozen human embryos, and the New York Task Force on Likfe and the Law proposed other options.

Author: Moskowitz, Ellen H.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Fertilization in vitro, Human, Human fertilization in vitro, Frozen human embryos, New York (State), states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Gay parents ruled fit; increasingly, courts are holding that sexual orientation per se cannot be used to preclude granting custody to a parent

Article Abstract:

Homosexual parents are increasingly considered by courts as fit to raise their children as the courts find that presumptions of unfitness prove inaccurate. Most courts are moving away from the 'per se' approach that deems homosexuality a presumption of unfitness, and toward a 'nexus' approach that considers how the parent's homosexuality influences the child. Research shows that lesbian women and heterosexual ones raise children in very similar ways, and that gay parents' children are not much likelier to be harassed.

Author: Greene, Cynthia L., Butler, Donald K.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
United States, Gay parents

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Custody of children, Child custody
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Strategy for survival: problems of legislative and executive power in the field of environmental protection in the Ukraine
  • Abstracts: Limits on habeas writ aren't a 'novel idea.' (response to National Law Journal editorial of Feb 8, 1993) (Letter to the Editor)
  • Abstracts: The treaty was not violated. Mandatory arbitration clauses in general liability insurance policies may prove expensive if they are contradicted by other primary or excess policy provisions
  • Abstracts: Companies plan for near-term offerings; many private businesses now operate with an eye to ultimate initial public offerings or sales
  • Abstracts: Polygraph exams could limit employers' losses; employers are permitted to use properly conducted polygraph tests to deter employee theft
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.